And here are some glimpses from the fight against this monster engineered to collapse our societies…
US Doctors are speaking about their struggle to oppose the lockdowns and promote the right treatments for Covid-19 (such as HCQ), as they are very aware of consequences in preventable deaths, suicides and increase in mental and physical diseases is stifled by the means of fear and intimidation... They say that "WE ARE DECEIVED AND CONTINUOUSLY BEING DECEIVED..." - View Before It's Taken Down!! Nationwide Lockdowns Are not the Solution--Coronavirus Doctors: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SUcPfTUA5vo
But how about the leaders who refused to enforce lockdowns on their people, was this maybe the most horrific decision that they could ever make?... Here is the example of the courageous governor of South Dakota who refused lockdown, getting 11 times less fatalities per 10,000 people than the state of New York!!... - Gov. Noem explains how South Dakota kept COVID cases low without locking down: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wlUkKPcwc0k
... and here that of the freedom-loving governor of Mississipi : - Rigid Lockdowns vs. Relative Freedom: A Tale of Two Southern Governors: https://fee.org/articles/rigid-lockdowns-vs-relative-freedom-a-tale-of-two-southern-governors/
(See also Mark Meuser, Esq. analysis of five states with lockdown compared to five states of comparable size with NO lockdown and concluding locked down states have substantially worse mortality rates
and also the study: Proof: Lockdowns Did Not Reduce Deaths - by Colleen Huber, NMD)
But much more can be added... The examples of no-lockdown countries such as Sweden, South Korea,Taiwan, Japan, Iceland, Belarus show that we here in the UK could have been better and even much much better without the lockdown, as in fact with it what we got here was WORSE than ANYONE in the world, with the exception of Belgium (counting the fatalities among the infected than us, according to the official numbers)... - Countries That DIDN’T Lockdown Got It Right: https://indianexpress.com/article/explained/explained-the-countries-that-have-not-imposed-lockdown-and-why-6389003/?fbclid=IwAR1ziht6r1i__q3GO4dqVaiB7c45oVBCxirMi3JPhNTlOPOpoV1rgg8mIZE
...And to this argument we should, of course, add the most disastrous blow on the economy that in itself lead and will lead to an horrific number of avoidable deaths!
- 150,000 Brits will die an 'avoidable death' during coronavirus pandemic through depression, domestic violence and suicideshttps://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8207783/150-000-Brits-die-coronavirus-pandemic-domestic-violence-suicides.html?fbclid=IwAR23ZOQ70wsjtQ_dxXUkKQcqxwEcRmQHFczMME-Q74cLOBs4_BUnFrcodL4
So although the previous numbers speak for themselves... Although some doctors and leading scientists risked all to show that these lockdowns and associated measures are genocidal at a scale never encountered in history...
- The Impacts of the Draconian Lockdowns: 1.1 Billion People At Risk of Starvation. Dr. John Ioannidis: https://www.globalresearch.ca/300-million-people-may-infected-covid-19-stanford-guru-john-ioannidis-says/5717660?fbclid=IwAR1DFjXZg5ylLn-FmW_2QgCTO5VmU_XAS4Ok__eTaVIV1WxnJsA8MMo36nc
- By the end of 2020 more people will have died from hunger, despair and suicide than from the corona disease. We, the world, is facing a famine-pandemic of biblical proportions": https://www.globalresearch.ca/corona-tyranny-death-famine/5711942
- Epidemiologist Dr Knut Wittkowski: ‘Lockdown Has No Benefit, Only Negative Effects’https://21stcenturywire.com/2020/05/01/coronavirus-epidemiologist-dr-knut-wittkowski-lockdown-has-no-benefit-only-negative-effects/?fbclid=IwAR3kB-Xa8wgweVE8I8-9x28spuk2VLD5FNnw1Za9Wjf4GWiNGJgF8yQ0j-I
Although even some MSM and financial think-thanks also eventually admited that lockdowns are genocidal... - Lockdowns failed to alter the course of pandemic and are now destroying millions of livelihoods worldwide, JP Morgan study claims: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8347635/Lockdowns-failed-alter-course-pandemic-JP-Morgan-study-claims.html?fbclid=IwAR3QuNLIUQKjKmq4R0ttPqbkPSUZuxda3r1BFvN6tz4T9fg4VJrBD_h0SRM
& Israeli Study Suggests Lockdown Has No Effect On Coronavirus Timeline, Says Israeli Space Agency Chair
..our beloved leaders, no guilt or remorse intended, seem to just can get enough of them... So, right... WHO is then really enforcing GENOCIDE here?!
P.S. To understand the madness of the agenda, one needs to observe that not even THEIR OWN numbers matter anymore, nor THEIR OWN previous assertions and in fact, NOTHING that for a person who was not born yesterday even resembles reason, logic or common-sense... Beyond the dense cloud of non-stop MSM disinformation, it is just a matter of brute authority. The true rainbow colours of global dictatorship are clear on display over the remains of all societies that have been built around a certain respect of the fundamental human rights...
But still...let's remember some official info showing that
- Before lockdown, Britain quietly downgraded status of virus threat (taking it out from the list of highly infectious diseases)... https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2020/mar/26/lockdown-britain-quietly-downgraded-status-virus-t/?fbclid=IwAR1uQmJYnmOjI_QMJwC3qs6Jq4uP87JYmcrt87r7x9wzlvNfUZN0fDTzMnU
- New study suggests Covid infections were falling before lockdown: https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/new-study-shows-covid-infections-were-falling-before-lockdown?fbclid=IwAR3vbA2MrMjORKHG4S_H15UWOW03HRzvzhn1l9GfNFC5ciYvvLi0kSRKpSk...
So this means not only the lockdown was useless, but what we now, at a time when very few if any deaths are still being recorded as of Covid-19, have to enjoy, is in fact, much authoritative and restrictive system of control than at the time when the pandemic was really at the highest intensity!... And not that the government(s) were in any way surprised by the more or less dangerous outbreak officially observed in December 2019, and declared an international public health concern at the end of January... As just a small proof of the paradoxical difference in matters of restrictive measures, we can also remember that at the beginning of March when disaster struck Italy, there were no protective measures at all applied to the passengers coming to the UK from Italy, as reported by Nigel Farage: https://www.newsweek.com/coronavirus-epidemic-economy-united-kingdom-nigel-farage-boris-johnson-1491302?fbclid=IwAR18TSrIYPc1KTtFhyiYVrpwvzyKWgYncyJ6i3_b6etQ8M9dlQPofW12w6I
Now, we have to consider the recent and most shocking example of completely UNJUSTIFIABLE MIX of PARTIAL LOCKDOWN and MARTIAL MEASURES being imposed on the people of Australia (!!!), state of Victoria, as a consequence of only 11 RECENT DEATHS due to Covid-19!... - Melbourne cops may now enter homes without warrant, after 11 people die of Covid – Australia, this is madness, not democracy: https://www.rt.com/op-ed/497095-melbourne-australia-covid-lockdown/?fbclid=IwAR2JR9rhjZij08e-6ck7h4MtlU9JomTcffz2f5F6_XcJOiwk0SkHFls_TjY
And finally, let’s get some common-sense coming even from the British MSM…
- Exclusive: No evidence for two-metre rule, Oxford experts say: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2020/06/15/two-metre-rule-has-no-basis-say-oxford-university-experts/
-Get on with your lives! Professor says as coronavirus 'not as deadly as first thought' https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/1326293/coronavirus-death-rate-UK-fatality-rate CORONAVIRUS is not as deadly as was thought and the public fear that is stopping the country returning to normal is unfounded, a leading expert says. Carl Heneghan, Professor of Evidence-based medicine at Oxford University, called for the government to intervene and "proactively reassure the population".
- UK lockdown was a ‘monumental mistake’ and must not happen again – Boris scientist says https://www.express.co.uk/life-style/health/1320428/Coronavirus-news-lockdown-mistake-second-wave-Boris-Johnson?fbclid=IwAR2U0WO6rOu9gb4c2xwrg56zcheH83GmDJ3HbOw47lpQFwUeg4VR04ZmEgU "Prof Woolhouse OBE, a member of the Scientific Pandemic Influenza Group on Behaviours that advises the Government, said: “Lockdown was a panic measure and I believe history will say trying to control Covid-19 through lockdown was a monumental mistake on a global scale, the cure was worse than the disease."
- Half a million Covid deaths was ABSURD we are being DUPED, says RICHARD MADELEY: https://www.express.co.uk/comment/columnists/richard-and-judy/1323175/coronavirus-lockdown-figures-covid-19-death-toll?fbclid=IwAR12sus_bc6OOVUEyPQ1Wc2p5LdO4TDNHMFmSoFrQX1ozTylRXRJ79PqDwA
You may also be interested to consider the following:
- QUESTIONING COVID - Clinicians, Researchers, & Health Experts from Around the World Interrogating the Mainstream Narrative Around the Pandemic: https://questioningcovid.com/
- Coronavirus Lockdown And What You Are Not Being Told – Part 1: https://in-this-together.com/coronavirus-lockdown-and-what-you-are-not-being-told-part-1/
- Coronavirus Lockdown And What You Are Not Being Told – Part 2: https://in-this-together.com/coronavirus-lockdown-and-what-you-are-not-being-told-part-2/
- More Experts Concede: Covid Lockdowns Were A Disaster
"From mainstream publications like the Wall Street Journal to top government health advisors in the UK, a consensus is building that the sledgehammer of Covid lockdowns has been an unmitigated disaster. It's good news that more mainstream sources are coming our way, but the dark forces of authoritarianism are not about to release their grasp so easily."
" … we found that an estimated 18.7 million life-years will be lost in the United States due to the COVID-19 lockdowns. Comparative data analysis between nations shows that the lockdowns in the United States likely had a minimal effect in saving life-years. Using two different comparison groups, we estimate that the COVID-19 lockdowns in the U.S. saved between a quarter to three quarters of a million life-years. " (study, commissioned by Revolver News )
16000 Doctors & Scientists Sign Declaration Strongly Opposing a 2nd COVID Lockdown https://www.collective-evolution.com/2020/10/09/16000-doctors-scientists-sign-declaration-strongly-opposing-a-2nd-covid-lockdown/"Many of these signees are some of the world’s top doctors and scientists, and they’ve been speaking out against lockdown measures since they first began months ago." It is called THE Great Barrington Declaration: https://gbdeclaration.org/"
"As infectious disease epidemiologists and public health scientists we have grave concerns about the damaging physical and mental health impacts of the prevailing COVID-19 policies, and recommend an approach we call Focused Protection. infectious disease epidemiologists and public health scientists we have grave concerns about the damaging physical and mental health impacts of the prevailing COVID-19 policies, and recommend an approach we call Focused Protection.Coming from both the left and right, and around the world, we have devoted our careers to protecting people. Current lockdown policies are producing devastating effects on short and long-term public health. The results (to name a few) include lower childhood vaccination rates, worsening cardiovascular disease outcomes, fewer cancer screenings and deteriorating mental health – leading to greater excess mortality in years to come, with the working class and younger members of society carrying the heaviest burden. Keeping students out of school is a grave injustice.Keeping these measures in place until a vaccine is available will cause irreparable damage, with the underprivileged disproportionately harmed.Fortunately, our understanding of the virus is growing. We know that vulnerability to death from COVID-19 is more than a thousand-fold higher in the old and infirm than the young. Indeed, for children, COVID-19 is less dangerous than many other harms, including influenza.As immunity builds in the population, the risk of infection to all – including the vulnerable – falls. We know that all populations will eventually reach herd immunity – i.e. the point at which the rate of new infections is stable – and that this can be assisted by (but is not dependent upon) a vaccine. Our goal should therefore be to minimize mortality and social harm until we reach herd immunity.The most compassionate approach that balances the risks and benefits of reaching herd immunity, is to allow those who are at minimal risk of death to live their lives normally to build up immunity to the virus through natural infection, while better protecting those who are at highest risk. We call this Focused Protection.Adopting measures to protect the vulnerable should be the central aim of public health responses to COVID-19. By way of example, nursing homes should use staff with acquired immunity and perform frequent PCR testing of other staff and all visitors. Staff rotation should be minimized. Retired people living at home should have groceries and other essentials delivered to their home. When possible, they should meet family members outside rather than inside. A comprehensive and detailed list of measures, including approaches to multi-generational households, can be implemented, and is well within the scope and capability of public health professionals.Those who are not vulnerable should immediately be allowed to resume life as normal. Simple hygiene measures, such as hand washing and staying home when sick should be practiced by everyone to reduce the herd immunity threshold. Schools and universities should be open for in-person teaching. Extracurricular activities, such as sports, should be resumed. Young low-risk adults should work normally, rather than from home. Restaurants and other businesses should open. Arts, music, sport and other cultural activities should resume. People who are more at risk may participate if they wish, while society as a whole enjoys the protection conferred upon the vulnerable by those who have built up herd immunity."
Lockdown restrictions violates Art 1, 2, 5, 8, 9, 11 and 14 of the Human Rights Act 1998.
Lockdowns Don’t Prevent Coronavirus Spread (12 Jan 2021), AIER
" In great contrast to the terrifying projections from imagined models, this study showed real outcomes with real people going about their real pandemic lives. It could very well be that lockdowns work in some settings, in some jurisdictions, and under some conditions. But in a setting with voluntary compliance, high trust in government and lots of general information available to the citizen, such as across Denmark (and other Nordic and Northern European countries), lockdowns don’t seem to have added anything to prevent the spread. "
Though this seems to be a matter of zero importance for our governments, peer-reviewed study "did not find evidence" lockdowns were effective in stopping COVID spread. England, France, Germany, Iran, Italy, Netherlands, Spain, South Korea, Sweden, and the US were taken into account.
- ASSESSING MANDATORY STAY-AT-HOME AND BUSINESS CLOSURE EFFECTS ON THE SPREAD OF COVID-19
"Conclusions: While small benefits cannot be excluded, we do not find significant benefits on case growth of more restrictive NPIs. Similar reductions in case growth may be achievable with less restrictive interventions.
[...] In summary, we fail to find strong evidence supporting a role for more restrictive NPIs in the control of COVID in early 2020. We do not question the role of all public health interventions, or of coordinated communications about the epidemic, but we fail to find an additional benefit of stay-at-home orders and business closures. The data cannot fully exclude the possibility of some benefits. However, even if they exist, these benefits may not match the numerous harms of these aggressive measures. More targeted public health interventions that more effectively reduce transmissions may be important for future epidemic control without the harms of highly restrictive measures."
Another important document accomplished by renown law expert, dr. Reiner Fuelmich:
- Cease and desist papers served on Prof. Dr. Christian Drosten by Dr. Reiner Füllmich (the 5 lockdown fallacies)
Psychologist Emma Kenny thinks current Covid legislation needs to be questioned, debated, and changed to allow people to regain their freedoms.
"One of the most rebellious voices against lockdown in America has been South Dakota Governor Kristi Noem who insisted that her state remained free from excessive shutdowns and reactionary public health orders which other states are claiming is necessary to ‘fight the pandemic.’ Thus far, this northern midwest state has fared well in its handling of the coronavirus crisis, and many are crediting the governor for prioritizing the rights and liberties of her residents over political posturing and capitulation to mainstream media pressure – both of which seems to be driving failed policies in other states ." (https://21stcenturywire.com/2020/10/26/governor-kristi-noem-liberty-and-the-pandemic/?fbclid=IwAR3zKXT-gYbo0SGsKHn0mRBDbYHU5T8pAZMdZNtTrW9CFVev1KpoZ9kXcaA)
This is an excerpt under fair use, with comments - see full version here: https://www.rte.ie/player/series/prim...
It’s now looking like the lockdowns may have been a huge mistake: (NEW YORK TIME, September 2020)
"But the apparent success of South Korea and island nations — Taiwan, Singapore, New Zealand — in doing so could never be replicated in the continental, globalized United States.
Governors imposing continued lockdowns claimed to be “following the science.” But only in one dimension: reducing the immediate number of COVID-19 cases. The lockdowns also prevented cancer screenings, heart-attack treatment and substance-abuse counseling, the absence of which resulted in a large but hard-to-estimate number of deaths. What Haidt and Lukianoff call “vindictive protectiveness” turned out to be not very protective."
- The 1% blunder: How a simple but fatal math mistake by US Covid-19 experts caused the world to panic and order lockdowns (dr. Malcolm Kendrick) - RT
- Up to 90% of people who test positive for Covid barely carry any virus & are not contagious. Every stat about the disease is bogus (Peter Adams, Irish genetician): - RT
- Lockdown supporters are using psychology pseudoscience to label anti-maskers as irrational, stupid sociopaths (Frank Furedy, emeritus professor of sociology - RT
"‘The rule of six’ could be ‘the rule of seven’, the pubs could close at midnight or 10pm, level 4, 5 or 75 could be enforced – none of this would make any difference. Nor is it acceptable. The fiddled numbers, the fake compromises, the newspeak – all of it is misdirection. In a nutshell, this doubling down means nothing less than the acceleration of an end to the free, decent life to which all human beings are born entitled. Only a total return to normality should be demanded, and it’s non-negotiable." (Peter Andrews)
"Can anyone else remember back in March, when we had three weeks to slow the spread, flatten the curve, so we locked down for the first time? If that was such a resounding success, why are we steadily shutting down the country again? Why will it be six months this time? Why not three months? Why not 12 months? Why not just indefinitely until we find a cure for death?" (Guy Birchall)
" Thousands of Britons who suffer heart attacks and strokes are dying at home instead of seeking medical treatment, a new study has found, as new government figures show 75,000 are projected to die as a result of lockdown measures. "
'There is no second wave': Oxford expert says rise in UK Covid cases is because of 'increased testing' and those infected are 'young, healthy, symptomless people' who are unlikely to die or be hospitalised (Sept. 2020)
" Professor Carl Heneghan, a medicine expert at the University of Oxford, said: 'There is currently no second wave. What we are seeing is a sharp rise in the number of healthy people who are carrying the virus, but exhibiting no symptoms. Almost all of them are young. They are being spotted because – finally – a comprehensive system of national test and trace is in place "
"Dr. David Nabarro from the WHO appealed to world leaders yesterday, telling them to stop “using lockdowns as your primary control method” of the coronavirus.
He also claimed that the only thing lockdowns achieved was poverty – with no mention of the potential lives saved."
& associated - New WHO estimate puts coronavirus death rate at only 0.13% (Oct 5, 2020)
U.N. body's figure in March was 26 times higher
Researchers from Edinburgh University reassessed Imperial modelling that showed half a million people would die
Former Supreme Court judge says ministers ‘deliberately stoked up fear’ to justify lockdown curbs
" Jonathan Sumption, giving the annual Cambridge Freshfields Lecture, attacked the government for imposing draconian restrictions on people’s lives using ministerial decrees with minimal parliamentary scrutiny.
The former Supreme Court justice, who is also a medieval historian, said he believed that future generations would look back on the measures taken to contain coronavirus “as a monument of collective hysteria and governmental folly”.
He criticised Boris Johnson’s government, which he said during the three months of lockdown had “placed everybody under a form of house arrest, qualified only by their right to do a limited number of things approved by ministers”.
“The sheer scale on which the government has sought to govern by decree creating new criminal offences sometimes several times a week on the mere say so of ministers, is in constitutional terms truly breathtaking,”
Nabarro's message comes with lockdowns under fire by scientists, doctors
Dr. David Nabarro, the organization’s special envoy for COVID-19, said in a Friday interview on British television that “we in the World Health Organization do not advocate lockdowns as the primary means of control of this virus.”
He said the lockdowns may result in a doubling of world poverty and “at least a doubling of child malnutrition because children are not getting meals at school, and their parents in poor families are not able to afford it.”
LOCK SHOCK Sweden’s average daily Covid deaths fall to just 0.6 despite no national lockdown while UK & France soars to 200 (28 Oct 2020)
" SWEDEN'S seven-day rolling average coronavirus daily death toll has fallen to 0.6 despite the country having no national lockdown. " [...] Despite the UK and Sweden's different strategies a study in August showed exposure rates in Stockholm and London were similar. [...] Sweden has opted to offer guidelines to people without imposing strict rules and fines, and even gave advice to the UK despite Boris Johnson deciding to plunge millions back into lockdown.
When confronted with Sweden's example showing clearly the presence of herd immunity and success of their anti-lockdown, anti-mask policies... THERE IS NO ANSWER... THEY HAVE NO ANSWER. As simple as that. Prof. Paul Elliott interviewed by Julia from TalkRadio: https://www.facebook.com/adapnation/videos/826607134752535 See however dr. Eric Berg's data and explanations: https://www.facebook.com/drericberg/videos/414579453271150
On Nov 5, 2020 even the BBC puts up a clearly disturbing critic of the declared reasons for this second British lockdown, respectively the data of an already flawed statistical prediction. In other words, it appears that the lockdown must simply happen and this is rather a political decision, which justifies why the full transparency that Sir David Norgrove, chair of the UK Statistics Authority publicly asks for, cannot be provided.
- Covid: Regulator criticises data used to justify lockdown https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-54831334
"The projection was made weeks ago and had forecast there would be 1,000 deaths a day by the end of October when the average was actually four times less than that - a fact that was known at the time of Saturday's TV briefing.
What is more, the model had already been updated to predict a lower estimate, but this was not used in the briefing fronted by chief scientific adviser Sir Patrick Vallance and chief medical officer Prof Chris Whitty, alongside Prime Minister Boris Johnson."
Note that this is fully consistent with Lord Sumption position concerning what he calls 'deliberately stoking fear' in order to justify lockdowns... "Lord Sumption also warned that a move to a more authoritarian model of politics would outlast the current crisis. “The government has discovered the power of public fear to let it get its way. It will not forget.” he said." (Lord Sumption attacks government over coronavirus restrictions , Financial Times 27 Oct 2020)
Just a day later, on the 6th of November we find out that "CORONAVIRUS statistics used to justify a second lockdown in England have quietly been amended, drastically lowering the number of anticipated daily deaths." The prediction of 1,500 deaths per day until December 6, went down to 1,000 deaths per day. (Covid lockdown stats FALSE: Whitty and Vallance quietly change data after 'scaring' Brits https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/1356770/Coronavirus-lockdown-statistics-chris-whitty-patrick-vallance)
Add to this the fact that the same day, Downing Street REJECTS calls to end lockdown despite four more sets of real-world data showing second wave of Covid was dropping and R rate was stable BEFORE crippling restrictions based on flawed projections
The Office for National Statistics (ONS) "estimated the number of people getting infected each day dropped 12 per cent in a week from 51,900 to 45,700 in the seven-day spell ending on October 31 – the same day Boris Johnson announced the country was heading into another economically-crippling lockdown.
Department of Health figures today confirmed another 355 people have died of Covid-19 across the UK, which was an increase of nearly a third from last Friday, while another 23,287 tested positive, marking a five per cent fall in the week in another sign that infections have stopped rising.
MailOnline's analysis of Public Health England (PHE) statistics showed more than half of local authorities scattered across England saw their infection rates fall at the end of October. [...]
Other academics behind a symptom-tracking app are adamant the country's second wave has already peaked and is over. Even SAGE – Number 10's advisory panel which spooked ministers into adopting tougher action based on 'inaccurate' models – today admitted there is evidence outbreaks are slowing in 'some parts' of England. And the group of top scientists revealed the UK's R rate has remained at between 1.1 and 1.3 for the second week in a row. It has fallen in five out of seven regions in England, including the North West, North East and the Midlands, where 10million people were already living under the toughest Tier Three curbs."
" Christopher Snowdon, head of lifestyle economics at the Institute for Economic Affairs, said: 'Declining rates of infection in many parts of England were apparent before the Prime Minister made his announcement on Saturday and yet he seems to have been more persuaded by theoretical models passed around in secret.
'The experience of places such as Nottingham and Newcastle shows that the tide can be turned without resorting to the nuclear option of lockdown.'
He added: 'No attempt was made to predict the 'reasonable worst case scenario' for people's livelihoods, incomes and mental health. Nor have we been given any explanation for why people in Penzance have to lose their jobs to reduce infections in Salford. The people responsible for the flawed modelling should be held accountable for the economic disaster that will follow.'
Conservative MP Peter Bone told MailOnline that the PHE report 'bore out' what he was seeing in Northamptonshire and suggested the Tiers had been working before the blanket lockdown.
He also complained that the lockdown decision appeared to have been justified with an Iraq-style 'dodgy dossier of Covid graphs'.
'This is why I found it difficult to understand why we abandoned the Tier approach. And we now know by their own admission that the modelling was wrong,' he said.
'There are lies, damn lies and Covid statistics. Nobody has explained why we abandoned the Tier approach, unless it was they saw this dreadful model from scientists saying you're going to get 4,000 people dying every day. At the moment there doesn't seem to be any evidence we're moving in that direction.'
Mr Bone added: 'It feels to me like we were getting propaganda. We were only getting things that proved the Government's case.
'Those figures now seem to have been based on false assumptions or been incorrectly calculated. Other ones that point in a different direction haven't been disclosed. So it is a bit of a dodgy dossier really.'
Another Conservative MP, Marcus Fysh, told MailOnline: 'I have been concerned a while about the quality of the data and the quality of the analysis by the medical advisory team.
'Obviously the trends are serious, particularly in some areas in the North West and north East, London and the Midlands and we need to respect that.
'Confidence is everything in this… we need to build the confidence in the system. That is why we also need to not have dodgy charts produced like the Iraq war. A dodgy dossier is not something that builds public confidence. The opposite is true"
Even Theresa May pointed at this issue in the House of Commons... The former PM delivered a damning assessment of Boris Johnson's handling of the situation, saying a controversial claim that deaths could hit 4,000 a day by next month was 'wrong before it was even used'. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/video/theresamay/video-2284940/Video-Johnson-scuttles-House-leads-assault-lockdown-plans.html?mwv_rm=rta
Lord Sumption and others
Columnist Peter Hitchens says the BBC and the government have created a "panic-demic" - that people would not have noticed - by the "constant use of horror statistics."
More from Peter Hitchens: Peter Hitchens urges people to 'stop swallowing this garbage' on Covid restrictions
Nigel Farage will rebrand the Brexit Party as Reform UK - with lifting lockdown measures being a key policy of the new party. (2 Nov 2020)
Is the price worth paying? - see also: The Richie Allen Show - Thursday November 12th 2020
" Sir Desmond Swayne joins Richie to chat about the damage that lockdown is doing to the economy and the nations health. Sir Desmond is a proponent of letting people get on with their lives but also doing as much as possible to protect the vulnerable. Jim Fetzer is a former university professor and US Marine Corp instructor. Jim is an expert in critical thinking. "
Sir Charles Walker MP for Broxbourne in Hertfordshire gives an impassioned speech against the Lockdown measures and removal of UK civil liberties before the "Lockdown" vote which the Government subsequently won - 4th of November 2020.
Former Supreme Court judge Lord Jonathan Sumption has criticised the government's approach to the coronavirus pandemic, saying it has employed fear as a means to justify its action
See also Dr. Roger Hodkinson Addresses The Edmonton Council Chambers (min. 2 on) - unveiling everything about the hoax of Covid-19, uselesness of masks, false positive test, risk of death 1 in 300,000 for the less 65 year old etc (most of dr. Hodkinson's videos have been deleted from YTube); also Interview with Dr. Hodkinson on the 29 Nov 2020
Very important video presenting the censorship exposed by the famous British Medical Journal and the Lancet, and the vested interests of government's scientific advisers
Dr. Michael Ryan
Give customers a reason to do business with you.
-https://thecritic.co.uk/the-lockdown-lobotomy/?fbclid=IwAR00NRkI87TBRzbM0rwhwP68pfg0kwfE_q3iqndOtEfUYSHWlqT_pmJrvRo" rel="noopener" target="_blank"> THE LOCKDOWN LOBOTOMY
The effects of lockdown have caused far more damage than the virus ever could:
"A report by Her Majesty’s Government predicted that 200,000 people would die from delayed healthcare and economic recession caused by the response to COVID-19. Globally, the UN has estimated that 10,000 children every month are dying from hunger due to coronavirus measures; Oxfam has warned that this could kill 12,000 people per day by 2021. Looking at current data, CDC director Dr. Robert Redfield recently explained, “We’re seeing, sadly, far greater suicides now than we are deaths from COVID. We’re seeing far greater deaths from drug overdose…”
"While naysayers may pick holes in specific studies, the quantity and consistency of evidence is overwhelming: lockdown is stressful, it harms cognitive function, and it makes you susceptible to disease. Ultimately, the toll is high. A meta-analytic review (Holt-Lunstad et al., 2015) found that social isolation increases the likelihood of mortality by 29%. In short, lockdown is murder.
A thesis submitted to the University of Sussex (Cooper, 1999) reviewed social psychology studies and psychodynamic theories, and conducted multiple novel experiments, concluding that masks reduce self-awareness, consciousness, and identity. If you doubt the research, ask yourself: do you think wearing a face mask will have any kind of psychological effect; and, if so, what is it likely to be? There is a reason masks are chiefly worn by anarchists, criminals and perverts." [...]
Ultimately, the state’s response to COVID-19 is indefensible and a terrifying portent of what’s to come. It has engendered disconnection through social distancing, isolation through lockdown, and deindividuation through face masks – with signs pointing to social deterioration and psychological damage as a result. This is to say nothing of the devastating impact on the economy and, worse, human life."
Renown activist Deborah Tavares - ROCKEFELLER FOUNDATION to Create an Economically Unstable and Shock-Prone World
Professor Johan Giesecke, one of the world’s most senior epidemiologists, advisor to the Swedish Government (he hired Anders Tegnell who is currently directing Swedish strategy), the first Chief Scientist of the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, and an advisor to the director general of the WHO, lays out with typically Swedish bluntness why he thinks:
Ivor Cummings summary of statistics...
The ultimate update on our viral issue, bar none - Sept 8th 2020 .
Get educated guys and gals - or keep your head in the sand while your errant leaders destroy society around you... ;-) DOWNLOAD IT HERE: https://we.tl/t-2HHpYJaz9F - you all have full permission to upload it wherever you want.
See also Ivor Cummin's Viral Impact in England The Empirical Truth Part 1 (30 Nov 2020)
NIgel Farage - 20.09.20
A former Supreme Court justice has strongly criticised the government’s tightening of coronavirus social restrictions which comes into force today (September 14).
Resistance to the Government's abusive and unjustified measures grows steadily in the mainstream media and even in the British Parliament:
"A letter seen by The Sun on Sunday (22.11.2020) has been signed by 70 Tory MPs along with 14 peers, declaring their outrage at the approach.It states: “Government must publish a full cost-benefit analysis of the proposed restrictions on a regional basis so MPs can assess responsibly the non-Covid health impact of restrictions, as well as the undoubted impact on livelihoods.“Today, the lockdown cure prescribed runs the very real risk of being worse than the disease.”It adds: “We cannot live under such a series of damaging lockdowns and apparently arbitrary restrictions, and expect our constituents to be grateful for being let out to enjoy the festive season, only to have strict restrictions imposed on them afterwards that cause them health problems and destroy their livelihoods.“Our country instead needs a different and enduring strategy for living with the virus that can last beyond Christmas."Restrictions should be removed immediately if it cannot be shown that they are saving more lives than they cost.”
- LOCKED UP BY TIERS - Tougher tier lockdown means most people unable to mix with family and friends until EASTER
More truth, in the same paper, a day before... So, if this is not a wake up call, I think people are simply refusing to use their God-given judgment abilities...
- COVID TRUTHS
- COVID STATS REVEALED: 95% OF DEATHS HAD UNDERLYING HEALTH CONDITIONS AND ICU HOSPITAL BEDS LOWER THAN 5-YEAR AVERAGE (21.11.2020)
"Death graphs used to justify a second Covid lockdown in England were branded "misleading" by experts who said they are "mathematically incorrect".[...]They predicted a worst case scenario of more than 4,000 deaths a day by December. [...] The Cambridge model has since revised its estimates which are around 1,000 deaths by the start of December."
A similar position and arguments in a Daily Mail article (20.11.1010): WHAT THEY DON'T TELL YOU ABOUT COVID: FEWER BEDS TAKEN UP THAN LAST YEAR, DEATHS A FRACTION OF THE GRIM FORECASTS, 95% OF FATALITIES HAD UNDERLYING CAUSES... AND HOW THE FACTS CAN BE TWISTED TO STRIKE FEAR IN OUR HEARTS
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8971669/What-DONT-tell-Covid-facts-twisted-strike-fear-hearts.html"So who is Covid-19 killing?To put it simply, the victims are overwhelmingly the elderly and those with pre-existing conditions.Of the 37,470 Covid-19 deaths recorded by NHS England up to November 18, 53.7 percent were of people aged over 80.In comparison, there have been just 275 deaths (only 0.7 per cent of the total) in people under 40.[...] And crucially, those who have died from Covid-19 are overwhelmingly likely to have suffered from a pre-existing condition.Of those who have died from coronavirus, 35,806 people (95.6 per cent of the total) had at least one pre-existing serious medical condition.In fact, there have been just 42 deaths of people aged under 40 without a pre-existing condition."
What everybody should be aware of...
" in the middle of a “deadly pandemic” the number of inpatients and day cases is almost half of what it has been for the previous 5 years."
"In the middle of a “deadly pandemic” the number of people attending A&E in April 2020 was 66% down on the previous year and around 50% down on all other previous years."
" 2020 is the lowest on record in the past 20 years for deaths caused by respiratory diseases in every single month." (respiratory includes covid but also influenza, pneumonia etc)
National Records of Scotland:
A couple of observations, after performing a few basic math operations:
- The people who have Covid mentioned on the death certificate (not that they necessarily died of it) are 10% of all who died in 2020. The people with Covid mentioned who died and were below 75 years old are 2.2% of the total. Those below 65 are 0.6%.
Those who died with Covid (mentioned) below 45 are 1.7% of all deceased below 45.
Those who died of Covid between 45 and 64 are 15% of all deceased in the same age category.
Those who died of Covid over 65 are 11% of all who died of the same age.
Not to mention anything related to the underlying conditions common with the elderly, the refusal of therapies supported by doctors worldwide, the 93% lack of reliability in using the PCR test for diagnosis etc...
As for England...
- England – Does official NHS data support the Government’s Dictatorship?
"Boris Johnson imposed dictatorial, authoritarian measures on the British people on the 23rd March 2020 for a three-week period. The Prime Minister said he was doing this to “Protect the NHS” and “Save Lives”.
Ten Months later, it is now 2021 and the British people are still living under a dictatorial tyranny where it is illegal to have loved ones inside your home, illegal to socialise in groups larger than 6 and even then it must be from only 2 households and outside. It is also illegal to walk into a shop without a face nappy, and it is illegal to open your business if it is deemed as “non-essential” by the Government.
The list of draconian measures is endless, and apparently it is still all in the name of “Protecting the NHS” and “Saving Lives”
And now, THE FACTS:
"The average occupancy throughout December 2019 was around 96,000. Which means in reality there were actually 20,000 fewer occupied beds within NHS England hospitals during the “deadly pandemic”. December 2020 average – 76,000, December 2019 average, 96,000 "
"In 2020, April-June there were on average a total of 58,005 beds occupied which equated to 62% occupancy.
[...]As you can see every year prior to 2020 has an average occupancy rate of 91,000 / 90%. Whereas 2020 has 33,000 / 30% less beds occupied. What’s the difference between 2020 and all previous years? 2020 is meant to be a year where a “Deadly Pandemic” is raging throughout the world."
"2020 – April – 916,581 attended A&E / November – 1,485,132 attended A&E
[...]A&E attendance at what was the supposed height of what the authorities dubbed the “first wave” was 57% down on the previous year"
Currently the law only covers the Tier system. As can be found here. A quick search for any new legislation in 2021 reveals only an ‘FLEGT Licensing Scheme” and a ‘Scotland Health Protection Amendment’ have become law this year, see for yourself here.
PUBLIC SERVICE ANNOUNCEMENT: Recently Announced Lockdown is NOT Law! (Daily Expose, 5 Jan 2021)
Currently the law only covers the Tier system. As can be found here. A quick search for any new legislation in 2021 reveals only an ‘FLEGT Licensing Scheme” and a ‘Scotland Health Protection Amendment’ have become law this year, see for yourself here.
From Lockdowns to "The Great Reset" - 1.08.20
"WHO’s special envoy on COVID-19, Dr. David Nabarro, cautioned in a Thursday interview with BBC Radio 4’s Today that full national lockdowns should be used only as a “reserve” measure to control the coronavirus, describing such actions as very extreme. " [...] “The only time we believe a lockdown is justified is to buy you time to reorganize, regroup, rebalance your resources, protect your health workers who are exhausted, but by and large, we’d rather not do it.”
THE BEST MESSAGE ON THE TOPIC OF GOVERNMENT'S DESTRUCTIVE PANDEMIC MEASURES....
THANK YOU, COUNCILLOR RAY BURSTON!!
"I will no longer acquiesce in the Government’s failing lockdown strategy."
PRESS STATEMENT – by Cllr Ray Burston
Midday - Monday, December 21st 2020
This year’s CoVid19 emergency has been an unprecedented event that has even so showcased the ability of the British people to rise to any challenge. In particular, we will always remain indebted to our NHS front line staff, who have worked tirelessly to save lives. I commend too the work of the officers and staff of the local authority on which I serve for keeping its vital services functioning, as well as the Leader of Dudley Metropolitan Borough Council, Cllr Patrick Harley, and his cabinet colleagues for overseeing this magnificent response.
Like everyone else at the outset of this crisis, I abided by Government guidance on social distancing and other precautionary measures because I accepted that they were a regrettable necessity, intended to ‘flatten the curve’ so that our health service could be afforded valuable time to prepare for the rising number of CoVid19 hospital admissions. Like everyone else too, I was relieved when those measures were progressively lifted during the summer, enabling life to return to some kind of normality.
Thankfully, CoVid19 has not proved as deadly as was first feared – notwithstanding the lives it has sadly claimed (and that we still have no answer to the fundamental question: which hospital admissions died ‘from’ CoVid19 and which happened to die ‘with’ it?). While the frail elderly and those with existing life-threatening co-morbidities remain most at risk, over ninety-nine percent of people who become infected with the virus will manifest few, if any symptoms. Doctors are now more aware about how to treat patients with CoVid19; and the scientific community has developed vaccines that will hopefully counter it.
Moreover, we now know the devastating effect that the Government’s CoVid19 response measures – in particular, local and national lockdowns – have had upon our economy and upon people’s jobs, livelihoods and mental health.
Likewise, for many months the NHS abandoned referring or treating people suffering from other life-threatening illnesses, including cancers and heart disease. Many of these patients have since died of conditions that, in any other year, would have been readily treatable.
Meanwhile, our general wellbeing has been blighted by the almost total closure of our places of worship, our social clubs and gatherings, and our hospitality industry – further fuelling a pandemic of loneliness, despair and (tragically) suicides. In the final reckoning, our response to the virus will almost certainly result in more deaths than CoVid19 itself.
Indeed, since the publication of the ‘Great Barrington Declaration’ in September many eminent scientists contend that there is an alternative way of managing the virus that requires neither onerous constraints upon our freedom nor financially crippling lockdowns.
And yet the Government continues to pursue a policy of ever more convoluted and draconian measures to curtail our liberties, with ministers and their advisors thinking aloud that some or all of them may have to remain in place into the autumn of next year. In the light of the appalling damage that this will continue to inflict upon the social and economic fabric of this country, I believe it is simply too high a price to pay to combat a virus that poses no threat to the overwhelming majority of my fellow citizens. In fact, it is akin to amputating one’s leg in order to treat an ingrowing toenail. Or a man who, in his fixation with chasing and swatting a wasp, is thereby knocking over and smashing all his most valuable possessions.
It’s becoming more obvious too that, however well-intentioned the Government’s actions may be, their net effect has been to toy with the British people - like a cat toys with an injured mouse: promising us this and that, and then, when it fails to materialise, or is taken away again, blaming us for not following its increasingly pointless and arbitrary directives. The ‘cancelling’ of Christmas after the Prime Minister assured us that to do so would be ‘inhuman’ is merely the latest instalment in this cruel, ongoing charade.
Alas, this damaging and dictatorial dog's breakfast of rules and regulations has to end – along with the shameful misuse of our police to enforce petty infringements of them, and to harass those who dare protest them (even as we have witnessed those same police forces respond with considerably greater restraint towards other kinds of political demonstrations).
We British are, on the whole, a law-abiding people. As such, we have mostly done that which has been asked of us. However, by such complicity, I fear we are increasingly coming to resemble a ‘trauma-bonded’ abuse victim – pathetically grateful for whatever crumbs get tossed our way that might allow us to get on with our lives. Instead, I believe it is time for us to recover both our collective and individual self-respect by finally summoning the courage to tell the Prime Minister and his SAGE obsessives that enough is enough: we will no longer consent to having those lives turned upside down on the back of dodgy statistics and debatable science.
Therefore, it is with regret that I hereby announce that I will no longer acquiesce in the Government’s failing lockdown strategy, with its cruel, counterproductive and often patently absurd edicts – and, in particular, its constraints upon who we are permitted to meet. I do NOT need a minister of the crown telling me when and where and how I get to hug my grandchildren!
I do not seek confrontation over the exercise of this most basic human right. I have no plans to join a rave. I will wash my hands and follow other common-sense advice. Out of respect for others, I will continue to wear a mask when wandering around a supermarket. However, if exercising fundamental liberties that my parents and grandparents surrendered the best years of their lives defending means I stand in breach of the law, then so be it.
This is not a decision that I have taken lightly. As well as a good deal of prayer and reflection, it’s the culmination of months of mounting dismay, anger – and yes, despair – at watching my country collapse around me. And while I accept that Boris Johnson is an instinctive libertarian who has felt genuinely torn by many of the decisions he has made (that much you can discern from his body language), this unprecedented amassing of the apparatus of state control bodes ill should a future government choose to exercise it for more malign purposes.
I understand there will be consequences to taking this stand – more so given my status as an elected public servant. And while it would have been easier to simply defy these rules and regulations on the sly and hope no one notices – as many, many people already have done and ever more are now doing, in both high and low places – my conscience dictates that I must do so instead with my head held high. As Martin Luther King Jr once reminded us, “One who breaks an unjust law must do so openly, lovingly, and with a willingness to accept the penalty.”
Finally, I urge the increasing number of people – both elected public servants and ordinary citizens – who also feel as I do to openly, lovingly and willingly resolve themselves to no longer acquiesce in these unjust rules and regulations. After all, they can’t arrest and imprison us all. Meanwhile, if enough of us do so, then we may yet convince our government to abandon the ruinous course it’s pursuing – and while there is still a chance to save what’s left of our economy and our civil society.
Cllr Ray Burston,
Halesowen South ward,
Dudley Metropolitan Borough Council.
Midday - Monday, December 21st 2020
FB Groups (UK):
Stop Lockdown Glasgow
Scotland against Lockdown
Conscientous Objectors against Lockdown
Power to the People