See also: Human 2 0 Transhumanism C-1-9 Vaccine WARNING / WAKE UP Call To ALL the World Dr Carrie Madej ()Bitchute)
REGARDING: Moderna / Profusa Transhumanism AGENDA / Derek Rossi / Harvard / Operation Warp Speed / Bill & Malinda Gates Foundation / permanent damage / Eugenics / Synthetic modified RNA DNA / Stem Cells / Microneedle Platform / Hydrogel Nanotechnology Nanobots / Luciferase Enzyme / Transfection Process & GMO Humans - Gene Drive & Gene Extinction Technology - Mandates - Emergency Preparedness Act - Patented Ownership of Humans & the Human Genome / M.I.T. / Department of Defense / Darpa / Barcode / Internet of Things / The Human Matrix / Human 1.0 to Human 2.0 A.I. Artificial Intelligence Quantum Dot Tattoo Digital ID ID2020 Elon Musk / Ray Kurzweil / Robotic Nano Mosquitoes
- 2 Nov 2020 - Dr. Carrie Madej, DO is an osteopathic internal medicine physician in McDonough, Georgia
About the dangers of DNA/RNA nano-tech vaccines, that have never been used until now on human beings and lack the animal testing and placebo trials necessary to license such a medicine.
Confirmation that the new Covid 19 vaccines will use nano-technology: Scientists develop ‘nanoparticle’ Covid vaccine that triggers a 10x stronger immune response (3 Nov 2020)
See Dr. CARRIE MADEJ on Bitchute (her YT videos were almost all deleted)
Genetic vaccines against COVID-19: hope or RISK?
Essential explanations about DNA/RNA vaccines (such as the ones to be used for Covid-19 in UK and US), showing the way they hack into the very fabric of life at a cellular level - from biologist Clemens Arvay:
"Genetic vaccines could lead to an immune reaction against nucleic acids which could cause autoimmune reactions. Another possible reaction is the development of resistance to the antigen that could bear the risk that our immune system doesn't react appropriately anymore to similar viruses or similar antigens. Genetic vaccines have a low immunogenity which means that means that the desired immunity may not develop efficiently or (not be) long lasting (therefore) the need to repeat vaccination."[...]
For DNA vaccines it is well-documented that there is a danger of an insertion of DNA into the genome of our cells which can happen unintendedly. The result could be an activation of oncogenes (cancer genes) or a deactivation of the anti-carcinogenic DNA sections which would both increase the cancer risk...." [...]
"In the past, pre-clinical trials with ARN vaccination against SARS which is a precursor of the new coronavirus, the risk of significant lteration of the lung tissue became evident. These pulmonary inflammations seemed to be the result of an overreaction of the T-helper cells type 2 [...] So once again we are talking about a potentially increased cancer risk and severe autoimmune reactions that could be caused by genetic vaccines..." (See video's references also)
In the case of an RNA vaccine, the delivered RNA instructions instruct our cells to build a near-perfect replica of a very specific protein that resides on the outside of the SARS-CoV-2 virus called the “Spike” protein. This Spike protein normally resides on the outside of the virus and functions as a tether that enables the virus to enter into a human cell. Because the Spike Protein resides on the outside of the virus, it’s prime real estate for our immune system to target.
Therefore, when you are administered an RNA vaccine, this RNA will enter a small portion of your cells, and these cells will start churning out a replica of the viral Spike protein."[...] It is well known that RNA can be “reverse transcribed” into DNA. Residing in our cells are enzymes called “reverse transcriptases”. These enzymes convert RNA into DNA. Multiple sources for this class of enzymes exist within our cells. [...] With so many sources of reverse transcriptase, it is quite probable that the RNA introduced into our cells via the vaccine could be reverse transcribed into a segment of double-stranded DNA, and then integrated into our core genetic material in the nucleus of the cell. [...] What happens if this occurs? There are two possible outcomes that are not mutually exclusive. First, modification of somatic cells, and in particular, stem cells, could result in a segment of the population with an increasing percentage of their tissues being converted over to genetically modified cells. These genetically modified cells will possess the genetic sequence to produce Spike Protein. Because Spike protein is a foreign protein to the human body, the immune systems of these individuals will attack the cells in their body which express this protein. These people will almost inevitably develop autoimmune conditions which are irreversible, since this foreign protein antigen is now permanently hardwired into the instructions contained in their DNA. [...] In addition to the risks mentioned above, another risk becomes apparent: If the cell is infected with either an external virus, or endogenous retrovirus, while the vaccine is active in the cell, this from the vaccine could be genetically spliced into the existing genome of another virus. This virus would then gain a functional Spike protein, which would then allow it to infect respiratory tissues and other organs of the body. This means that viruses that were normally isolated to certain tissues would suddenly gain the ability to infect a much wider range of tissues, making them more pathogenic or deadly. [...] "
“By delivering synthetic genes into the muscles of the [experimental] monkeys, the scientists are essentially re-engineering the animals to resist disease.”
“’The sky’s the limit,’ said Michael Farzan, an immunologist at Scripps and lead author of the new study.”
“The first human trial based on this strategy — called immunoprophylaxis by gene transfer, or I.G.T. — is underway, and several new ones are planned.”
“I.G.T. is altogether different from traditional vaccination. It is instead a form of gene therapy. Scientists isolate the genes that produce powerful antibodies against certain diseases and then synthesize artificial versions. The genes are placed into viruses and injected into human tissue, usually muscle.”[...] “Still, Dr. Baltimore says that he envisions that some people might be leery of a vaccination strategy that means altering their own DNA, even if it prevents a potentially fatal disease.”
In the case of viruses and DNA in vaccines, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has internally noted1 that “small amounts of residual cell substrate DNA unavoidably occur in all viral vaccines as well as other biologics produced using cell substrates. There are several potential ways DNA could be a risk factor. DNA can be oncogenic or infectious; in addition, it can cause insertion mutagenesis through integration into the host genome.”
Since all vaccines contain residual DNA that has a potential to be oncogenic (causing cancer), mutagenic (changing your genetic code), and infectious, isn’t it of major concern that section 13 of every vaccine package insert2 states that the product has not been evaluated for carcinogenic (causing cancer) or mutagenic effects?
" But why do these vaccines need to be kept at -70C in the first place? The answer, it turns out, is because they contain potentially hazardous ingredients that have never been used in vaccines before. As Children's Health Defense explained in an August 6th article, "mRNA vaccines undergoing Covid-19 clinical trials, including the Moderna vaccine, rely on a nanoparticle-based “carrier system” containing a synthetic chemical called polyethylene glycol (PEG)." CHD goes on to explain: The use of PEG in drugs and vaccines is increasingly controversial due to the well-documented incidence of adverse PEG-related immune reactions, including life-threatening anaphylaxis. [...] Why are LNPs (Lipid Nanoparticles) used in these vaccines? As CHD further explains: LNPs “encapsulate the mRNA constructs to protect them from degradation and promote cellular uptake” and, additionally, rev up the immune system (a property that vaccine scientists tamely describe as LNPs’ “inherent adjuvant properties”) In other words, the LNPs are adjuvants, meaning they are designed to cause hyperinflammatory responses in human beings, once injected. This is done in an effort to induce the creation of antibodies that then allow the vaccine manufacturer to claim high "effectiveness" rates, even when those very same adjuvants cause severe adverse reactions. According to recent vaccine trials conducted by Moderna, 100% of human subjects in the high-dose vaccine trial group experienced adverse reactions. " [...]
The UK government has posted a bid and an award contract notice, seeking an Artificial Intelligence (AI) system that can process the expected flood of covid-19 vaccine injuries and side effects. That bid explains, in the government's own words: The MHRA urgently seeks an Artificial Intelligence (AI) software tool to process the expected high volume of Covid-19 vaccine Adverse Drug Reaction (ADRs) and ensure that no details from the ADRs’ reaction text are missed.
COVID Vaccine Hesitancy Widespread, Even Among Medical Professionals (30 Nov 2020, GreenMedInfo)
"Researchers from the University of California Los Angeles' Karin Fielding School of Public Health surveyed healthcare personnel working in the Los Angeles metropolitan area. As the Washington Post reported, they found that two thirds (66.5%) of healthcare workers "intend to delay vaccination," meaning they do not intend to get the COVID vaccine when it becomes available ."
See more about NANOTECHNOLOGY: 4 Ways Nanotechnology Will Change Our Lives
The shocking reason why Pfizer's coronavirus vaccine requires storage at -70C ... because it contains experimental nanotech components that have NEVER been used in vaccines before (18.11.2020) As Children's Health Defense explained in an August 6th article, "mRNA vaccines undergoing Covid-19 clinical trials, including the Moderna vaccine, rely on a nanoparticle-based “carrier system” containing a synthetic chemical called polyethylene glycol (PEG)." CHD goes on to explain: The use of PEG in drugs and vaccines is increasingly controversial due to the well-documented incidence of adverse PEG-related immune reactions, including life-threatening anaphylaxis. Roughly seven in ten Americans may already be sensitized to PEG, which may result in reduced efficacy of the vaccine and an increase in adverse side effects. If a PEG-containing mRNA vaccine for Covid-19 gains FDA approval, the uptick in exposure to PEG will be unprecedented—and potentially disastrous. Moderna documents and publications indicate that the company is well aware of safety risks associated with PEG and other aspects of its mRNA technology but is more concerned with its bottom line. [...] Why are LNPs (Lipid Nanoparticles) used in these vaccines? As CHD further explains: LNPs “encapsulate the mRNA constructs to protect them from degradation and promote cellular uptake” and, additionally, rev up the immune system (a property that vaccine scientists tamely describe as LNPs’ “inherent adjuvant properties”) In other words, the LNPs are adjuvants, meaning they are designed to cause hyperinflammatory responses in human beings, once injected. This is done in an effort to induce the creation of antibodies that then allow the vaccine manufacturer to claim high "effectiveness" rates, even when those very same adjuvants cause severe adverse reactions. According to recent vaccine trials conducted by Moderna, 100% of human subjects in the high-dose vaccine trial group experienced adverse reactions.
Inadequate Assessment of the Public Health Risk from a Covid Vaccine
In a recent letter to the British Medical Journal (BMJ), physician Arvind Joshi warned against the disaster that could result from this misguided policy and outlined the serious risks involved to the public and other serious issues that are being taken if a Covid Vaccine is rushed out without thorough and adequate safety and efficacy testing:
“Adverse effects like Subacute Sclerosing Pan Encephalitis, Ascending Polyneuritis, Myopathies, Autoimmune Diseases, and rarer chance of triggering development of malignancies are most dreaded possibilities.“...“The rush for the Vaccines should not lead to disaster.” (Note: There is a more comprehensive list of potential ‘bad outcomes’ in the link to the article.)
Virus-vectored and genetically engineered vaccines could undergo recombination or hybridization with unpredictable outcomes.…Previous attempts to develop coronavirus and other vaccines e.g., RSV and dengue, have been hampered by the problem of ‘antibody dependent enhanced immunity’(ADEI), which has led to severe illness and deaths in the animals and human subjects involved in the trials28. This phenomenon only becomes apparent after vaccination, when the subject is exposed to wild virus at some point in the future. Worryingly, the Covid Vaccine trials have not been conducted in a way to exclude the possibility of this serious sequalae occurring months or years after vaccination...
Late onset adverse vaccine effects such as Subacute Sclerosing Pan Encephalitis (SSPE),Ascending Polyneuritis, Myopathies, Autoimmune Diseases, Infertility and Cancers cannot be ruled out with short duration trials.” (“Open Letter From: UK Medical Freedom Alliance To: The Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunization… for COVID-19 in the UK.”) [...]
“Prevention of infection must be a critical endpoint…(But) Prevention of infection is not a criterion for success for any of these vaccines. In fact, their endpoints all require confirmed infections and all those they will include in the analysis for success, the only difference being the severity of symptoms between the vaccinated and unvaccinated. Measuring differences amongst only those infected by SARS-CoV-2 underscores the implicit conclusion that the vaccines are not expected to prevent infection, only modify symptoms of those infected“…
“We all expect an effective vaccine to prevent serious illness if infected. Three of the vaccine protocols…do not require that their vaccine prevent serious disease only that they prevent moderate symptoms which may be as mild as cough, or headache.” (“Covid-19 Vaccine Protocols Reveal That Trials Are Designed To Succeed”, Forbes)
In a January 2021 Zoom meeting, Dr. David Martin, drops truth bombs about the Covid “vaccine” ( FOCUS ON FAUCI (OFFICIAL EVENT) CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY, JUDY MIKOVITS, ROBERT F. KENNEDY 5/01/2021)
“Let’s make sure we are clear… This is not a vaccine. They are using the term “vaccine” to sneak this thing under public health exemptions. This is not a vaccine. This is mRNA packaged in a fat envelope that is delivered to a cell. It is a medical device designed to stimulate the human cell into becoming a pathogen creator. It is not a vaccine. Vaccines actually are a legally defined term under public health law; they are a legally defined term under CDC and FDA standards. And the vaccine specifically has to stimulate both the immunity within the person receiving it and it also has to disrupt transmission. And that is not what this is. They have been abundantly clear in saying that the mRNA strand that is going into the cell is not to stop the transmission, it is a treatment. But if it was discussed as a treatment, it would not get the sympathetic ear of public health authorities because then people would say “what other treatments are there?“ The use of the term vaccine is unconscionable for both the legal definition and also it is actually the sucker punch to open and free discourse… Moderna was started as a chemotherapy company for cancer, not a vaccine manufacturer for SARSCOV2. If we said we are going to give people prophylactic chemotherapy for the cancer they don’t yet have, we’d be laughed out of the room because it’s a stupid idea. That’s exactly what this is. This is a mechanical device in the form of a very small package of technology that is being inserted into the human system to activate the cell to become a pathogen manufacturing site. And I refuse to stipulate in any conversations that this is in fact a vaccine issue. The only reason why the term is being used is to abuse the 1905 Jacobson case that has been misrepresented since it was written. And if we were honest with this, we would actually call it what it is: it is a chemical pathogen device that is actually meant to unleash a chemical pathogen production action within a cell. It is a medical device, not a drug because it meets the CDRH definition of a device. It is not a living system, it is not a biologic system, it is a physical technology - it happens to just come in the size of a molecular package. So we need to be really clear on making sure we don’t fall for their game. Because their game is if we talk about it as a vaccine then we are going to get into a vaccine conversation but this is not, by their own admission, a vaccine. As a result it must be clear to everyone listening that we will not fall for this failed definition just like we will not fall for their industrial chemical definition of health. Both of them are functionally flawed and are an implicit violation of the legal construct that is being exploited. I get frustrated when I hear activists and lawyers say “we are going to fight the vaccine”. If you stipulate it’s a vaccine you’ve already lost the battle. It’s not a vaccine. It is made to make you sick… 80% of the people exposed to SARSCOV2 are asymptomatic carriers. 80% of people who get this injected into them experience a clinical adverse event. You are getting injected with a chemical substance to induce illness, not to induce an immuno-transmissive response. In other words, nothing about this is going to stop you from transmitting anything. This is about getting you sick and having your own cells be the thing that get you sick.
When the paymaster for the distribution of information happens to be the industry that’s doing the distributing, we lose. Because the only narrative is the one that will be compensated by the people writing the check. That goes for our politicians… and our media - it has been paid for - if you follow the money you realize there is no non-conflicted voice on any network.”
Scientists have also developed a programmable vaccine using the CRISPR technology which has the ability to re programme DNA and cells with whatever the scientific globalists desire (video)
D R. ANDREW KAUFMAN RESPONDS TO REUTERS “FACT-CHECK” ON COVID-19 VACCINE GENETICALLY MODIFYING HUMANS (video)
(Warpspeed Chief Dr. Moncef Slaoui, a former executive with vaccine manufacturer GlaxoSmithKline )
Slaoui is currently partner at MediciX investment firm, chairman of the board at Galvani Bioelectronics, chairman of the board at SutroVax and sits on the boards of Artisan Biosciences, Human Vaccines Project and the aforementioned Moderna Therapeutics.
Galvani Bioelectronics was formed out of an agreement with Verily Life Sciences LLC (formerly Google Life Sciences), an Alphabet company, and GSK. The goal is to “enable the research, development and commercialisation of bioelectronic medicines.” Bioelectronic medicine is a relatively new research field focused on tackling chronic diseases by using “miniaturised, implantable devices that can modify electrical signals that pass along nerves in the body, including irregular or altered impulses that occur in many illnesses”. GSK has been active in this field since 2012 and has stated that chronic conditions such as arthritis, diabetes and asthma could potentially be treated using these devices.
Researchers Warn Some Covid-19 Vaccines Could Increase Risk Of HIV Infection (Forbes20.10.2020)
" Ad5 is used as a vector in some Covid-19 vaccines — Science identifies four such candidates that are currently undergoing clinical trials in various countries around the world, including the U.S., with two in large scale phase 3 trials ongoing in Russia and Pakistan.
The researchers stressed the need to understand the role Ad5 might play in increasing the risks of HIV in vulnerable populations before developing and deploying vaccines using the vector, adding that informed consent documents should reflect the “considerable literature” on the risk of HIV acquisition with Ad5 vectors. "
How COVID-19 Vaccine Can Destroy Your Immune System (dr. J. Mercola, 11.09.2020)
Questions to and answers from authorities regarding the flu vaccine in the context of the pandemic
Proof of that Covid19 Vaccine will be effective (dr. Bartholomeus Lakeman FOIA addressed to the Department of Health and Social Care) 4 Nov 2020
AstraZeneca vaccine AZD1222 will it prevent a covid19 infection (dr. Bartholomeus Lakeman FOIA addressed to the Department of Health and Social Care) 28 Oct 2020
THE NUREMBERG CODE aimed to protect human subjects from enduring the kind of cruelty and exploitation the prisoners endured at concentration camps. The 10 elements of the code are:
The Charter of Patient Rights and Responsibilities from NHS SCOTLANDstipulates at page 13:"You have the right to accept or refuse any treatment, examination, test or screening procedure that is offered to you. - If you can understand the information you are given and are capable of making a decision for yourself about the care or treatment you are offered, then you have the right to accept or refuse any treatment, examination, test, or screening procedure, or to take part in research." - Bubble indemnity: Big Pharma firms will NOT be held accountable for side effects of Covid vaccine: AN example of how academics justify mandatory vaccination as compatible with human rights (ECHT) - Written evidence from Dr Lisa Forsberg*, Dr Isra Black**, Dr Thomas Douglas*, Dr Jonathan Pugh* (COV0220) - Compulsory vaccination for Covid-19 and human rights law(no mention to vaccination risks or the disputable ethic of the vaccine producing corporations - see Violation Tracker Parent Company Summary - Ex: AstraZeneca, Sanofi, Pfizer )
Exclusive: more than 100,000 patients will have to get jab elsewhere as GPs say they lack capacity to take part
THE NUREMBERG CODE aimed to protect human subjects from enduring the kind of cruelty and exploitation the prisoners endured at concentration camps. The 10 elements of the code are:
The Charter of Patient Rights and Responsibilities from NHS SCOTLAND
stipulates at page 13:
"You have the right to accept or refuse any treatment, examination, test or screening procedure that is offered to you. - If you can understand the information you are given and are capable of making a decision for yourself about the care or treatment you are offered, then you have the right to accept or refuse any treatment, examination, test, or screening procedure, or to take part in research."
AN example of how academics justify mandatory vaccination as compatible with human rights (ECHT) - Written evidence from Dr Lisa Forsberg*, Dr Isra Black**, Dr Thomas Douglas*, Dr Jonathan Pugh* (COV0220) - Compulsory vaccination for Covid-19 and human rights law
(no mention to vaccination risks or the disputable ethic of the vaccine producing corporations - see Violation Tracker Parent Company Summary - Ex: AstraZeneca, Sanofi, Pfizer )
Dr. Andrew Kaufman: They Want To Genetically Modify Us With The COVID-19 Vaccine (Updated) https://www.activistpost.com/2020/05/... Doctor Andrew Kaufman Website https://www.andrewkaufmanmd.com False claim: A COVID-19 vaccine will genetically modify humans https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-fa... DNA, RNA and protein – the Central Dogma https://science-explained.com/theory/... The Emerging Role of DNA Vaccines https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/... Advancing Novel Experimental Gene-based COVID-19 Vaccine, AAVCOVID https://eye.hms.harvard.edu/news/harv... Adenovirus DNA Replication https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/arti... CRISPR-Cas9: Gene Drives https://wyss.harvard.edu/media-post/c... Antisperm Contraceptive Vaccines: Where we are and where we are going? https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/arti... The HSD-hCG Vaccine Prevents Pregnancy in Women: Feasibility Study of a Reversible Safe Contraceptive Vaccine https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9083611/ Development of antifertility vaccine using sperm specific proteins https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/arti... State Bar Group Calls for 'Mandatory' COVID-19 Vaccinations, Regardless of Objections https://www.law.com/newyorklawjournal... AstraZeneca CEO Soriot says fast-tracked COVID-19 shot will protect for just one year https://www.fiercepharma.com/vaccines... New COVID-19 restrictions will be needed for anti-vaxxers https://www.theage.com.au/national/vi... Colorado Bill Would Require “Re-Education” Classes for Parents Who Refuse Coronavirus Vaccine https://www.lifenews.com/2020/06/09/c... MLAs vote to drop notwithstanding clause from mandatory vaccination bill https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-br... Among Americans who say they wouldn't get vaccinated, 7 in 10 worry about safety https://www.foxbusiness.com/money/get... There appears to be a coronavirus vaccine on the horizon—but it’s a GMO and the FDA would need to approve testing https://geneticliteracyproject.org/20... GMO tomato as edible COVID vaccine? Mexican scientists work to make it a reality https://allianceforscience.cornell.ed...SHOW LESS
Covid-19 Vaccine mandates are on the way...What can YOU do? Also on Bitchute at: https://www.bitchute.com/video/17SO4A... Links to references mentioned: The Swine Flu Immunization Program of 1976: https://www.fordlibrarymuseum.gov/lib...2009 Swine Flu vaccine – narcolepsy: www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/concerns/history/narcolepsy-flu.html Ensuring Uptake of Vaccines against SARS-CoV-2: https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056...Trump using military to distribute vaccines: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-he...AB1710 - CA bill allowing pharmacists to administer COVID-19 EUA vaccines: http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/fac...PREP Act – no liability: https://www.phe.gov/Preparedness/lega...COVID-19 Operation Warp Speed Vaccine purchase orders: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/h... .
Moderna Wants to Transform the Body Into a Vaccine-Making Machine: "How well mRNA vaccines will actually prevent Covid-19 remains unknown. No vaccine based on messenger RNA has ever been approved for any disease, or even entered final-stage trials until now, so there’s little published human data to compare how mRNA stacks up against older technologies. And the vaccines have hardly been free of side effects: In Moderna’s Phase I trial, all 15 of the patients who received the median of three dose sizes reported at least one side effect, though none were severe. Three of the 15 patients at the highest dose had temporary severe reactions. That dosage won’t be tested further."
"This was the strategy hatched in 1992 with Agenda 21: Control over biological diversity using advanced technology. Anything that is alive, including all humanity, is in the Technocrat's crosshairs for total makeover via genetic engineering. " ( Technocracy News & Trends )
Evidence for the corruption of the UK Vaccine Network by The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation buying influence. 32 members of the panel have recived in excess of £200,000,000 in grants from The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. YOU CAN READ THE FULL STORY HERE: https://beforeitsnews.com/politics/20... VIDEO: Really Graceful Fact Checkers - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4GbbS...VIDEO: James Corbett: Fact Checkers - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rtirK... .
Johnson & Johnson Pauses COVID Vaccine Trials After ‘Unexplained Illness’ (Children Defense League, October 14, 2020)
Johnson & Johnson temporarily paused Phase 3 clinical trials of its COVID-19 vaccine on Monday after one participant experienced what the company termed “an unexplained illness.
"Less than 12 hours after vaccination, Hayden suffered muscle aches, vomiting, spiked a 103.2 degree fever and lost consciousness. His girlfriend caught him as he fell. His Moderna trial supervisor instructed Haydon to call 911 and described him as being the “sickest in his life”. Moderna let Haydon believe the illness was just a sad coincidence unrelated to the jab. Moderna never told Haydon he was suffering an Adverse Event."
Russia's top respiratory doctor quits over 'gross violations' of medical ethics that rushed through Putin's coronavirus 'vaccine' 13.08.2020 (dr. Alexander Chucalin, who created the Russian Research Institute of Pulmonology, and is head of the Department of Hospital Therapy, at the Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University affirms: " 'Safety always comes first. How to evaluate it? The vaccines that are being created today have never been used in humans, and we cannot predict how a person will tolerate it. [...] 'Those vaccines that are now being developed by many of our research centres, the criteria for their safety can only be of a short-term nature.
'But the safety criteria for a vaccine must also be long-term and this becomes clear only with long-term observation - at least two years.' [...]
Vladimir Putin announces Russia approved first ever Covid vaccineLoaded: 0%Progress: 0%0:00PreviousPlaySkipMuteCurrent Time0:00/Duration Time1:09FullscreenNeed Text
In a separate attack on the vaccine, Prof Alexander Chepurnov said the 'danger exists' of 'increasing the disease with the wrong design of the vaccine'.
Chepurnov is former head of the laboratory for specially hazardous diseases at Vector Institute in Siberia which is also involved in developing vaccines for coronavirus.
(Sept 11, 2020) "
TM is a neurological disorder characterized by inflammation of the spinal cord, a major element of the central nervous system. It often results in weakness of the limbs, problems emptying the bladder and paralysis. Patients can become severely disabled and there is currently no effective cure."
[...] " As Forbes reported in May, all six monkeys injected with AstraZeneca’s COVID-19 vaccine became infected with COVID-19 after being inoculated. Then, all the monkeys were put to death, meaning the public won’t know if other issues were to have developed. "
Second subject injured in AstraZeneca Covid-19 vaccine trials: AstraZeneca vaccine volunteer developed spinal inflammation & ‘rare neurological condition’ after two doses – report (RT Sept 17, 2020)
" A British participant in AstraZeneca's coronavirus vaccine trial was diagnosed with a serious neurological disorder weeks after her second dose of the inoculation, an internal company document shows.
A previously healthy 37-year-old woman was hospitalized this month after receiving two injections of the pharmaceutical giant’s new vaccine, where it was determined she developed transverse myelitis, a rare neurological ailment caused by inflammation of the spine, according to an internal AstraZeneca safety report obtained by CNN."
see also: Yet Another UK COVID Vaccine Volunteer Suffers Brain Damage (Sept 21)
" Transverse myelitis is a serious and rare disease, and its repeated cases among the participants of the trials may well see AstraZeneca losing its vaccine bid all together.
AstraZeneca’s vaccine uses a monkey adenovirus that shares a gene with the Covid-19 coronavirus. It’s an untested method of vaccine development, according to Kirill Dmitriev, CEO of the Russian Direct Investment Fund that bankrolled the Russian vaccine development."
"Brazil’s health authority, Anvisa, and Oxford University confirmed the death but said the clinical trials will continue. Oxford said an independent review had revealed there were ‘no safety concerns’ with the vaccine. Neither Anvisa nor the laboratory have confirmed whether the volunteer received a placebo dose or the real vaccine. However, according to Globo, sources linked to the international study of the vaccine said the participant received a placebo." (See also Daily Mails report: Brazilian doctor, 28, who died from coronavirus after volunteering for Oxford vaccine trial was in the control group that got placebo and trial will continue - 21 Oct 2020)
" Mere days after Pfizer announced its new “90% effective” coronavirus vaccine, reports have emerged about “severe” side effects volunteers for the vaccine trial experienced, including fevers and headaches. [...]
In fact, Pfizer’s press release mentioned 43,538 participants enrolled in the study, with only “94 confirmed cases of COVID-19 in trial participants.” This means that only 0.2 percent of participants were tested positive for the coronavirus.
As only 94 participants were tested positive, it also appears difficult to generalize the vaccine is “more than 90% effective,” since some people might have been exposed to the virus more frequently, or for a longer time." (Trials paper from Pfizer, 2020 - A PHASE 1/2/3, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED, RANDOMIZED, OBSERVER-BLIND, DOSE-FINDING STUDY TO EVALUATE THE SAFETY, TOLERABILITY, IMMUNOGENICITY, AND EFFICACY OF SARS-COV-2 RNA VACCINE CANDIDATES AGAINST COVID-19 IN HEALTHY INDIVIDUALS )
" Both companies acknowledged that their vaccines could induce side effects that are similar to symptoms associated with mild Covid-19, such as muscle pain, chills and headache. "
A 75-year-old man from Beit She’an died of a heart attack about two hours after being vaccinated against the novel coronavirus on Monday morning, the Health Ministry reported.
The man had preexisting conditions and had suffered from heart attacks in the past, it said.[...]
The initial findings do not show a link between the man’s death and his vaccination, Levy said.
When Pfizer presented its safety data to the US Food and Drug Administration in early December, it was found that two trial participants had died after receiving the vaccine. One of the deceased was immunocompromised, meaning the person’s immune defenses were low.
In response to the report of those deaths, Israel’s Midaat Association said when vaccines are administered to at-risk populations, “there may be unfortunate cases.
- Speed of coronavirus vaccine race 'crazy' and unsafe, scientists warn 'The more this moves into politics, the more it becomes a little crazy,' one leading expert says:
Add to this an interesting response from Michael Yeadon a PHD in Pharmacology: - "If any such vaccine is approved for use under any circumstances that are not EXPLICITLY experimental, I believe that recipients are being misled to a criminal extent. This is because there are precisely zero human volunteers for.."
Past vaccine disasters show why rushing a coronavirus vaccine now would be 'colossally stupid' (CNN)VACCINE EXPERTS ARE WARNING THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AGAINST RUSHING OUT A CORONAVIRUS VACCINE BEFORE TESTING HAS SHOWN IT'S BOTH SAFE AND EFFECTIVE. DECADES OF HISTORY SHOW WHY THEY'RE RIGHT."This could do substantial damage," Kinch said. Kinch, who is a patient in one of the vaccine trials himself, said the clinical trial process needs to be followed to the end. A too-early EUA for a vaccine could cause a "nightmare scenario," for a few reasons.One, the vaccine may not be safe. Two, if it is not safe, people will lose faith in vaccines. Three, if a vaccine doesn't offer complete protection, people will have a false sense of security and increase their risk. Four, if a substandard vaccine gets an EUA, a better vaccine may never get approval, because people would be reluctant to enroll in trials and risk getting a placebo instead of a vaccine."People are going to die unnecessarily if we take chances with this," Kinch said. "We've got to get this right."
Pfizer expands coronavirus vaccine trial to include children as young as 12 (RT Oct. 12) "The expanded testing comes as Pfizer and a number of other drug makers race to complete phase III trials and seek emergency FDA approval for their inoculations, with Pfizer currently the frontrunner and the first to begin testing for children. "
Oxford University & AstraZeneca’s Toxic Vaccine Tested On Children (Sept 2020, The Bernicicn)" Until four days ago, AstraZeneca was testing the Oxford University vaccine on children, before they halted the tests after an adult subject was reported to have developed symptoms of transverse myelitis, an inflammatory syndrome that affects the spinal cord, which is known to cause serious neurological disorder.The previously untested COVID-1984 vaccine, which failed to cure monkeys of the virus [that has never been proven to exist], was being tested on children aged between 5 and 12 years old, with the alleged consent of their parents or guardians, despite the fact that their young bodies are much more susceptible to vaccine injury than adults."
Johnson & Johnson and AstraZeneca Making Coronavirus Vaccines Using Cells From Aborted Babies
UK to host ‘human challenge’ trials for COVID-19 vaccines (Al Jazeera, Sept. 2020) - In January, volunteers will be deliberately infected with coronavirus to test effectiveness of vaccine candidates.- confirmed by Metro 20 Oct. 2020 - Humans to be deliberately infected with Covid in UK to speed up vaccine
Humans to be deliberately infected with Covid in UK to speed up vaccine" The group of 90 participants will be aged 18 to 30 and will be carefully monitored to assess how the vaccine works and any possible side effects. ADVERTISEMENT Visit our live blog for the latest updates Coronavirus news live It is hoped trials will start in January, with results expected by May 2021, pending approval from regulatory bodies and ethics committees.NOTE: Two healthy people getting transverse myelitis in the Astrazeneca trials after the second shot already .... no animal studies... Furthermore, the whole script is based on the belief that the Virus can cause death.So, no doubt, this is HUMAN EXPERIMENTATION: THE NUREMBERG CODE says the following Human experiments should be based on previous animal experimentation No experiments should be conducted if it is believed to cause death/disability
Mercola: How COVID-19 Vaccine Trials Are Rigged (Oct 2020)However, when it comes to the COVID-19 vaccine, shockingly, preventing infection is not a criterion for success in any of these trials. The only criterion for a successful COVID-19 vaccine is a reduction of COVID-19 symptoms, and even then, the reduction required is minimal.“We all expect an effective vaccine to prevent serious illness if infected. Three of the vaccine protocols — Moderna, Pfizer, and AstraZeneca — do not require that their vaccine prevent serious disease only that they prevent moderate symptoms which may be as mild as cough, or headache,” Haseltine writes,2 adding:“The pharmaceutical companies intend to do trials ranging from 30,000 to 60,000 participants. This scale of study would be sufficient for testing vaccine efficacy.The first surprise found upon a closer reading of the protocols reveals that each study intends to complete interim and primary analyses that at most include 164 participants. These companies likely intend to apply for an emergency use authorization (EUA) from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) with just their limited preliminary results. [...] As if that’s not eyebrow-raising enough, the minimum qualification for a “case of COVID-19” amounts to just one positive PCR test and one or two mild symptoms, such as headache, fever, cough or mild nausea. As noted by Haseltine, “This is far from adequate.”All they’re doing is testing to see if this COVID-19 vaccine will minimize common cold symptoms. They are not actually ensuring the vaccine will prevent serious COVID-19 complications. Johnson & Johnson’s trial is the only one that requires at least five severe COVID-19 cases to be included in the interim analysis.” See also the previous Forbes' article: Covid-19 Vaccine Protocols Reveal That Trials Are Designed To Succeed (Sept 2020)
High volume of COVID-19 vaccine “adverse drug reactions” expected in the UK, is the United States next? (23 Nov 2020)" Supplies – 506291-2020 was officially dispatched back in mid-October by the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency. MHRA is an executive agency in the UK and sponsored in part by the Department of Health and Social Care that “regulates medicines, medical devices and blood components for transfusion.”In the contract, MHRA clearly states that they expect a “high volume” of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in response to the upcoming COVID-19 vaccine"
CRACKED TEETH & OTHER COVID VACCINE SIDE EFFECTS (as also the VACCINE TRIALS' ISSUES) - Del Bigtree and investigative journalist Jeffrey Jaxen (video) - October 2020
" Let’s put this in perspective. First, a relative risk reduction is being reported, not absolute risk reduction, which appears to be less than 1%. Second, these results refer to the trials’ primary endpoint of covid-19 of essentially any severity, and importantly not the vaccine’s ability to save lives, nor the ability to prevent infection, nor the efficacy in important subgroups (e.g. frail elderly). Those still remain unknown. Third, these results reflect a time point relatively soon after vaccination, and we know nothing about vaccine performance at 3, 6, or 12 months, so cannot compare these efficacy numbers against other vaccines like influenza vaccines (which are judged over a season). Fourth, children, adolescents, and immunocompromised individuals were largely excluded from the trials, so we still lack any data on these important populations.
I previously argued that the trials are studying the wrong endpoint, and for an urgent need to correct course and study more important endpoints like prevention of severe disease and transmission in high risk people."
MANDATORY VACCINATION IS HERE?
"Yesterday (May 13, 2020) President Trump announced that Moroccan-born Dr. Moncef Slaoui, the former chairman of GlaxoSmithKline’s vaccines division, would serve as Chief Adviser for Operation Warp Speed, the administration’s project to fast-track a COVID-19 vaccine.Slaoui will work together with General Gustave Perna, who was apointed as the Chief Operation Officer for Operation Warp Speed."UPDATE: Operation Warp Speed Reveals COVID Vaccine Distribution Plan by Military: “All of America Must Receive the Vaccine Within 24 Hours” After FDA Fast-track Approval (Nov 2020)
Affordable Care policy in the US Hospitals: This is the expected next stage meaning overriding the masks obsession with the much more pervasive vaccination obsession...Thus, if you want any kind of medical intervention, you are asked to sign a consent that you agree to have them giving you vaccines or 'biogenics' (which includes everything they find necessary including vaccination); if you do not want it, this is noted down as a 'refusal'... But anyway, vaccines can be given even under anesthesia and some people already got such, without wanting them!!....Again, it appears that they do not need to make vaccines mandatory, for they can find very many ways to make them unavoidable...- Nurse Warns of "Biologics" & Forced Flu Shots Happening in US Hospitals
Mandatory MRNA Vaccines are Coming We are moving to step 5. Mandated MRNA vaccines are coming - stopthecrime.net (Deborah Tavares).
While 83% of the Americans are doubting a rushed Covid-19 vaccine and maybe more than a third of the British people would not take such, China, as always, leads the way in matters of experimenting on its own population!... - Experimental COVID-19 Vaccines Given to Hundreds of Thousands of Chinese: workers, border inspectors, members of the military, staff at transport hubs, and Huawei employees have all had access to domestically developed vaccines that are still undergoing clinical trials. "China’s drug regulator authorized three experimental coronavirus vaccines for emergency use among those in high-risk groups such as medical workers, pandemic response officials, border inspection agents, and members of the military, though the final trials to prove that the vaccines are safe and effective are still underway." "As with any other vaccine, the informed consent form listed common reactions that may occur after injection with the COVID-19 vaccine, including fever, headache, fatigue, nausea, diarrhea, muscle pain, joint pain, and lethargy. The employee of the state-owned company said recipients of the CNBG vaccine are required to report only fever."
Coronavirus vaccine: Can UK make COVID-19 vaccination mandatory? (10.11.20)" According to Louise Hooper of Garden Court Chambers, current legislation makes it clear the Government does not have power to “include mandatory treatment or vaccination”.Ms Hooper said: “Powers to make regulations in England and Wales are made under and subject to the restrictions in the 1984 Act.“The Coronavirus Act 2020 introduces separate powers for Scotland and Northern Ireland to make health protection law under their devolved powers.“These ensure that a similar prohibition on powers requiring mandatory medical treatment including vaccination and other prophylactic treatment is in force.”" She added enforcing mandatory vaccination would be an infringement of civil liberties and human rights.Ms Hooper said: “It is clear that mandatory medical treatment and vaccination are explicitly prohibited by the Act.“There is, however, potential for abuse leading to infringement of civil liberties and human rights unless the powers contained in the Coronavirus Act are exercised lawfully.
- BoJo hosts Bill Gates & pharma bigwigs to plot Covid-19 vaccine deployment as UK military preps for ‘biggest effort since WWII (12 Nov 2020)" During the roundtable, Johnson reaffirmed his commitment to using the UK’s G7 presidency next year to impose a sweeping global health plan developed by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation in partnership with the Wellcome Trust in the name of preventing future pandemics. Gates, who lacks a college degree or medical training, praised Johnson for allowing his foundation to craft UK (and potentially global) health policy as the PM restated the Gates Foundation’s five-point plan for the nation’s new “global approach” to “health security.” "
- Coronavirus vaccine not compulsory in Scotland as public promised maximum information (22 NOv 2020) - Health Secretary Jeane Freeman says every household in the country will receive full details at the start of the new year.
- More Than 2/3rds Of Americans Oppose Mandatory COVID-19 Vaccinations (22 Nov 2020)
WHO WILL BE VACCINATED?
According to Bill Gates, a great friend of the UK government, every man, woman and child on the planet. However there are priorities:In the UK, Care home residents and staff will be first to get a Covid-19 vaccine ahead of NHS staff all over-80s, government advice states as US-firm Novavax launches final 10,000 person trial of jab in UK:
This resonates with Bill Gates great care for the elderly, as it can be seen from the following: Bill Gates: End-of-Life Care vs. Saving Teachers' Jobs: in his words..."Is spending a million dollars on that last three months of life for that patient... would it be better not to lay off those ten teachers and to make that trade in medical costs? But that's called a death panel and you're not suppose to have that discussion..." The Pope,as expected is on the side of the poor, first and foremost... Poor should get Covid-19 vaccine first, Pope Francis says (September 25)
LACK OF LIABILITY
AstraZeneca to be exempt from coronavirus vaccine liability claims in most countries (30 July 2020)" (Reuters) - AstraZeneca has been granted protection from future product liability claims related to its COVID-19 vaccine hopeful by most of the countries with which it has struck supply agreements, a senior executive told Reuters. [...] The United States, however, already has a law to exclude tort claims from products that help control a public-health crises in the form of the 2005 Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness, or PREP Act.AstraZeneca, Britain’s second-largest drugmaker, has pledged to supply a total of more than 2 billion doses at no profit in agreements with the United States, Britain and European countries, among other nations and organisations."see also who sponsored MHRA (Dec 2017) MHRA awarded over £980,000 for collaboration with the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the World Health Organisation Doctors say CDC should warn people the side effects from Covid vaccine shots won’t be ‘a walk in the park’ (23 Nov 2020) “We really need to make patients aware that this is not going to be a walk in the park,” Fryhofer said during a virtual meeting with the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, or ACIP, an outside group of medical experts that advise the CDC. She is also a liaison to the committee. “They are going to know they had a vaccine. They are probably not going to feel wonderful. But they’ve got to come back for that second dose.” The government (your tax payer money) will pay for all injuries (which according to HMRCA will be numerous enough to require AI processing) caused by the new wonderful experimental rushed mRNA Pfizer* vaccine. As it has been with all the other vaccines before **, all over the world.https://www.independent.co.uk/.../coronavirus-pfizer..."The UK government has granted pharmaceutical giant Pfizer a legal indemnity protecting it from being sued, enabling its coronavirus vaccine to be rolled out across the country as early as next week. The Department of Health and Social Care has confirmed the company has been given an indemnity protecting it from legal action as a result of any problems with the vaccine."
WOULD YOU DO TO ANOTHER WHAT YOU DON'T WANT TO BE DONE UNTO YOURSELF? THIS IS THE QUESTION... (1 Jan 2021)
-https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-9104845/Up-60-health-workers-refusing-COVID-19-vaccines.html?ito=social-facebook&fbclid=IwAR1XUHcashtjuJbZ9bvVACniiQGHXx59iUsLynwc2VY1j6BdL4RvUCq_vOw " rel="noopener" target="_blank"> Up to 60% of US health workers are refusing to get COVID-19 vaccines over fears of side effects
In Ohio, about 60 percent of nursing home staff say they will not get a COVID-19 vaccine
In Los Angeles, between 20 and 40% of health care workers are refusing the shot
About half of health workers in Riverside County, California, are saying 'no'
NETHERLANDS: 87,000 NURSES REFUSE COVID-19 VACCINE (video - Dec 2020)
Bill Gates funds invisible “tattoo ID” to track people (27 Apr 2020) Suspicion grows: Does Bill Gates, long hopeful that vaccines will help curb population growth, want global citizens to “prove” they get the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine with invisible tattoo? Immunity passports? Try vaccine passports – citizens call foul as concerns grow about a conspiratorial bait and switch
NANOTECHNOLOGY - Risks of using nanotechnology for medical purposes have been already been highlighted in several studies: - Nanoparticles – known and unknown health risks: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC544578/ "Particles in the nano-size range can certainly enter the human body via the lungs and the intestines; penetration via the skin is less evident. […] The increased risk of cardiopulmonary diseases requires specific measures to be taken for every newly produced nanoparticle. There is no universal "nanoparticle" to fit all the cases, each nanomaterial should be treated individually when health risks are expected. The tests currently used to test the safety of materials should be applicable to identify hazardous nanoparticles. Proven otherwise, it would be a challenge for industry, legislators and risk assessors to construct a set of high throughput and low cost tests for nanoparticles without reducing the efficiency and reliability of the risk assessment.
Nanoparticles designed for drug delivery or as food components need special attention.- Health Effects of Nanoparticles: http://www.nanoparticles.org/pdf/HealthEffects.pdf
Health Risks Of Nanotechnology: How Nanoparticles Can Cause Lung Damage, And How The Damage Can Be Blocked: https://www.sciencedaily.com/releas…/2009/…/090610192431.htm
See also: PRE-FILLED COVID 19 VACCINE SYRINGES TO HAVE RFID CHIP ('optional') - video
Bill Gates funds invisible “tattoo ID” to track people (27 Apr 2020)
Suspicion grows: Does Bill Gates, long hopeful that vaccines will help curb population growth, want global citizens to “prove” they get the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine with invisible tattoo?
Immunity passports? Try vaccine passports – citizens call foul as concerns grow about a conspiratorial bait and switch
NANOTECHNOLOGY - Risks of using nanotechnology for medical purposes have been already been highlighted in several studies:
- Nanoparticles – known and unknown health risks: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC544578/ "Particles in the nano-size range can certainly enter the human body via the lungs and the intestines; penetration via the skin is less evident. […] The increased risk of cardiopulmonary diseases requires specific measures to be taken for every newly produced nanoparticle. There is no universal "nanoparticle" to fit all the cases, each nanomaterial should be treated individually when health risks are expected. The tests currently used to test the safety of materials should be applicable to identify hazardous nanoparticles. Proven otherwise, it would be a challenge for industry, legislators and risk assessors to construct a set of high throughput and low cost tests for nanoparticles without reducing the efficiency and reliability of the risk assessment. Nanoparticles designed for drug delivery or as food components need special attention.- Health Effects of Nanoparticles: http://www.nanoparticles.org/pdf/HealthEffects.pdf - Health Risks Of Nanotechnology: How Nanoparticles Can Cause Lung Damage, And How The Damage Can Be Blocked: https://www.sciencedaily.com/releas…/2009/…/090610192431.htm
See also: PRE-FILLED COVID 19 VACCINE SYRINGES TO HAVE RFID CHIP ('optional') - video
Quantum dots as a promising agent to combat COVID‐19
Quantum Dots are Developed by using Nanoparticles
Nanotechnology for COVID-19: Therapeutics and Vaccine Research
Nanoparticle-Based Strategies to Combat COVID-19
Nanotechnology for COVID-19: Therapeutics and Vaccine Research
Nanotechnology Offers Opportunities in Vaccine Design
Nanoparticles and viruses operate at the same size scale; therefore, nanoparticles have an ability to enter cells to enable expression of antigens from delivered nucleic acids (mRNA and DNA vaccines) and/or directly target immune cells for delivery of antigens (subunit vaccines).
Many vaccine technologies employ these direct benefits by Encapsulating genomic material or protein/peptide antigens in nanoparticles such as lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) or other viruses such as Ads.
BioNTech/Pfizer and Moderna encapsulate their mRNA vaccines within LNPs while the University of Oxford/Astrazeneca (from here on out referred to as Oxford/Astrazeneca) and CanSino incorporate antigen-encoding sequences within the DNA carried by Ads.
Novavax decorates recombinant S proteins of SARS-CoV-2 onto their proprietary virus like particle (VLP) nanoparticles.The nanoparticles are described in further detail in the discussion below.
What is a Quantum Dot?
Quantum Dots are developed using Nanotechnology. Quantum Dots are nanocrystals which are composed of a semiconductor core material which is further fenced inside another semiconductor material having larger spectral band gap.
Biocompatible Quantum Dots for Biological Applications
Quantum Dots in Cell Biology
Quantum Dots: A Barcoding System for People
Why? What are the benefits?
COVID-19 Vaccine Development Info:
The COVID-19 vaccine development landscape
The 2020 Pandemic: Current SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine Development
The COVID-19 Vaccine Race: Challenges and Opportunities in Vaccine Formulation
Nanoparticle Vaccines Against Infectious Diseases
Quantum Dot Nanoparticles
Design of a Novel Vaccine Nanotechnology-based Delivery System Comprising CpGODN-protein Conjugate Anchored to Liposomes
PubMed Central (PMC)
Kevin Corbett & Kate Shemirani : GENOCIDE NOTICE addressed to Vicky Ford MP Parliamentary Under Secretary of State for Children and Families and to Matt HancockDear Under Secretary,We are writing to you with regard to the planned Covid-19 vaccination program.We wish to draw your attention to the expected high number of adverse reactions which the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) explicitly state are a “direct threat to patient life and public health”:“For reasons of extreme urgency under Regulation 32(2)(c) related to the release of a Covid-19 vaccine MHRA have accelerated the sourcing and implementation of a vaccine specific AI tool.Strictly necessary — it is not possible to retrofit the MHRA’s legacy systems to handle the volume of Adverse Drug Reactions [ADRs] that will be generated by a Covid-19 vaccine. Therefore, if the MHRA does not implement the AI tool, it will be unable to process these ADRs effectively. This will hinder its ability to rapidly identify any potential safety issues with the Covid-19 vaccine and represents a direct threat to patient life and public health.Reasons of extreme urgency — the MHRA recognises that its planned procurement process for the SafetyConnect programme, including the AI tool, would not have concluded by vaccine launch.”https://ted.europa.eu/udl?uri=TED:NOTICE:506291-2020:TEXT:EN:HTML&src=0We, as health care professionals having a combined experience in excess of seventy years, with extensive knowledge of the history of vaccines, vaccine ingredients and their side-effects, are deeply concerned about the MHRA’s expected morbidity and mortality in vaccine recipients.We therefore hereby inform you that if the planned vaccination program shall proceed then you will be directly culpable for the infant mortality and damage caused to children for whom you and the local authorities you oversee are responsible. [...]
Hundreds of NHS staff form anti-vax group and label new Covid jabs 'poison "NHS and care home staff in their hundreds have formed a group opposed to vaccinations, wearing masks and testing in hospitals.The 250 plus-member strong group, NHS Workers for Choice, No Restrictions for Declining a Vaccine, includes a GP, several A&E nurses, healthcare assistants, lab workers, and care home staff."- NHS workers for choice, no restrictions for declining a vaccine. (FB Group)
Message from the Pr. PERRONNE on vaccines! (Dec 2020)
France, which has been having a nightmare for months, is waking up.
In many cities in our beautiful country, the people are on the move to regain their freedom, to demand the return of democracy.
As a doctor, infectious disease specialist and having served as president of many public health bodies or advice, including vaccines, I measure daily the uncertainties that generate fear and increasing disarray of our fellow citizens. I take the risk of being called a ′′ conspiracy ′′ or better a ′′ reassurist ", terms referring to those who criticize or challenge the unique thought.
I end up being proud of these names, my words expressing the truth have never changed since the epidemic began. So I consider it my responsibility to express myself again today on the whole medical aspect of Covid-19 and especially on the subject of vaccination, now the central and almost unique element of health policy in the state.
Many French people have been mesmerized by the politics of fear. Since September 2020, we had been told a terrible second wave of the epidemic, worse than the first.
The Minister of Health, Dr. Olivier Véran, the President of the Scientific Council of the Elysee, Professor Jean Fran ançois Delfraissy, the Director
General of Health, Professor Jerome Solomon, the Pasteur Institute have announced catastrophic numbers with an exponential increase in the death toll. Hospitals needed to be saturated and overwhelmed.
Even the President of the Republic, during a recent TV address announcing reconfinement, predicted no less than 400.000 deaths, falling out of the 200.000
Estimated dead shortly before by Professor Arnaud Fontanet of Pastor.
These unrealistic numbers had only one goal, to maintain fear to make us stay confined, wisely masked. Yet the widespread use of masks in general population has no scientific interest in stopping the SARS-COV-2. epidemic.
The use of masks should be targeted to the sick, their surroundings (especially at-risk) and carers on contact.
The epidemic is regressing and has not led to any apocalypse. The dynamics of the curve have been showing for weeks the profile of a seasonal epidemic rebound that is seen with certain viruses, once the epidemic wave is over.
This reflects the adaptation of the virus to humans and is also a reflection of the collective immunity that is progressing in the population and protecting us naturally.
The virus strains currently circulating have lost their virulence. Authorities won't be able to say it's because the downward trend had started even before it was put in place.
The regression of the epidemic had even begun, in some agglomerations, before curfew was introduced.
Unfortunately, there are still deaths that happen in very elderly, big obese or people with severe diabetes, severe high blood pressure, already disabling cardiorespiratory or kidney diseases.
These people at risk are perfectly identified. Health measures should therefore be targeted to protect, screen and treat them as soon as possible with hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin symptoms which are widely confirmed with the efficacy and safety if given early treatment.
Many deaths could have been prevented. However, general practitioners and geriatricians have been deterred from treating.
In this context, continuing to persecute our children behind useless masks remains incomprehensible.
All these measures are taken to ensure that the French are demanding a vaccine. What's the point of a widespread vaccine for a disease with nearly 0,05 % mortality? None. This mass vaccination is pointless. Also, the risks of vaccination can be greater than the benefits.
The most disturbing part is that many countries, including France, are saying they are ready to vaccinate in the coming weeks, as the development and evaluation of these products went fast and no result of the effectiveness or the danger of these vaccines has not been published to date.
We only had the right to press releases from the industrial manufacturers, allowing their stock exchanges to flame.
The worst part is that the first ′′ vaccines ′′ we are offered are not vaccines, but gene therapy products.
We're going to inject nucleic acids that will cause our own cells to make virus elements.
The consequences of this injection are absolutely unknown because it is a first in humans. What if some ′′ vaccinated ′′ cells made too many viral elements, causing uncontrollable reactions in our bodies?
The first gene therapies will be at RNA, but there are projects with DNA. Normally, in our cells, the message is from DNA to RNA, but the opposite is possible in certain circumstances, especially since our human cells have contained so-called ′′ endogenous ′′ retroviruses integrated into our DNA since the beginning of the night. chromosomes.
These ′′ domesticated ′′ retroviruses that inhabit us are usually harmless
(unlike HIV, AIDS retrovirus for example), but they can produce an enzyme, reverse transcriptase, capable of transcribing backwards, from RNA to DNA.
Thus an RNA that is foreign to our body and administered by injection could code for equally foreign DNA that can fit into our chromosomes.
So there is a real risk of transforming our genes permanently. There is also the possibility, by modifying the nucleic acids of our ova or sperm, to pass these genetic modifications on to our children.
People who promote these gene therapies, falsely called ′′ vaccines ′′ are wizard apprentices and take the French and more
generally world citizens, for guinea pigs.
We don't want to become, like tomatoes or the but transgenic GMOs (genetically modified organisms). A medical officer of one of the pharmaceutical laboratories manufacturers said a few days ago that he hopes for a personal protective effect, but that it shouldn't be too hopeful for an impact on the transmission of the virus, so on the dynamics of the epidemic.
This is a confession in disguise that it is not a vaccine. A fill.
I'm all the more horrified that I've always been in favour of vaccines and have presided over over immunization policy bodies for years.
Today, stop this extremely disturbing plan. Louis Pastor must turn around in his grave.
Science, medical ethics and above all common sense must take over.
Dr. Wodarg and Dr. Yeadon request a stop of all corona vaccination studies and call for co-signing the petition (1 Dec 2020)
Some great disclosures follow:
The full text of the petition of Dr. Wodarg and Dr. Yeadon (containing a scientific critic of the PCR test) can be found here
An Excerpt from this petition concerning the issue of coronavirus vaccines:
VIII. For a vaccine to work, our immune system needs to be stimulated to produce a neutralizing antibody, as opposed to a non-neutralizing antibody. A neutralizing antibody is one that can recognize and bind to some region (‘epitope’) of the virus, and that subsequently results in the virus either not entering or replicating in your cells. A non-neutralizing antibody is one that can bind to the virus, but for some reason, the antibody fails to neutralize the infectivity of the virus. In some viruses, if a person harbors a non-neutralizing antibody to the virus, a subsequent infection by the virus can cause that person to elicit a more severe reaction to the virus due to the presence of the non-neutralizing antibody. This is not true for all viruses, only particular ones. This is called Antibody Dependent Enhancement (ADE), and is a common problem with Dengue Virus, Ebola Virus, HIV, RSV, and the family of coronaviruses. In fact, this problem of ADE is a major reason why many previous vaccine trials for other coronaviruses failed. Major safety concerns were observed in animal models. If ADE occurs in an individual, their response to the virus can be worse than their response if they had never developed an antibody in the first place. This can cause a hyperinflammatory response, a cytokine storm, and a generally dysregulation of the immune system that allows the virus to cause more damage to our lungs and other organs of our body. In addition, new cell types throughout our body are now susceptible to viral infection due to the additional viral entry pathway. There are many studies that demonstrate that ADE is a persistent problem with coronaviruses in general, and in particular, with SARS-related viruses. ADE has proven to be a serious challenge with coronavirus vaccines, and this is the primary reason many of such vaccines have failed in early in-vitro or animal trials. For example, rhesus macaques who were vaccinated with the Spike protein of the SARS-CoV virus demonstrated severe acute lung injury when challenged with SARS-CoV, while monkeys who were not vaccinated did not. Similarly, mice who were immunized with one of four different SARS-CoV vaccines showed histopathological changes in the lungs with eosinophil infiltration after being challenged with SARS-CoV virus.
IX. There are some concerning issues with the trial designs, spelled out by Dr. Peter Doshi in the British Medical Journal. Dr. Doshi focuses on the two biggest issues. First, none of the leading vaccine candidate trials is designed to test if the vaccine can reduce severe COVID-19 symptoms, defined as: hospital admissions, ICU or death. And, second, the trials are not designed to test if the vaccine can interrupt transmission (https://www.bmj.com/content/bmj/371/bmj.m4037.full.pdf). If neither of these conditions is met, the vaccine in essence performs like a therapeutic drug, except a vaccine would be taken prophylactically, even by the perfectly healthy, and more than likely carries a higher risk of injury than a therapeutic drug. If this were to be true, then therapeutic drugs would be superior to any COVID vaccine. X. In the Pfizer/BioNTech mRNA vaccine candidate, polyethylene glycol (PEG) is found in the fatty lipid nanoparticle coating around the mRNA. Seventy percent of people make antibodies to PEG and most do not know it, creating a concerning situation where many could have allergic, potentially deadly, reactions to a PEG-containing vaccine. PEG antibodies may also reduce vaccine effectiveness. Pfizer/BioNTech is also inserting an ingredient derived from a marine invertebrate, mNeonGreen, into its vaccine. The ingredient has bioluminescent qualities, making it attractive for medical imaging purposes, but it is unclear why an injected vaccine would need to have that quality. mNeonGreen has unknown antigenicity.
XI. Several vaccine candidates are expected to induce the formation of humoral antibodies against spike proteins of SARS-CoV-2. Syncytin-1 (see Gallaher, B., “Response to nCoV2019 Against Backdrop of Endogenous Retroviruses” - http://virological.org/t/response-to-ncov2019- against-backdrop-of-endogenous-retroviruses/396), which is derived from human endogenous retroviruses (HERV) and is responsible for the development of a placenta in mammals and humans and is therefore an essential prerequisite for a successful pregnancy, is also found in homologous form in the spike proteins of SARS viruses. There is no indication whether antibodies against spike proteins of SARS viruses would also act like anti-Syncytin-1 antibodies. However, if this were to be the case this would then also prevent the formation of a placenta which would result in vaccinated women essentially becoming infertile. To my knowledge, Pfizer/BioNTech has yet to release any samples of written materials provided to patients, so it is unclear what, if any, information regarding (potential) fertility-specific risks caused by antibodies is included. According to section 10.4.2 of the Pfizer/BioNTech trial protocol, a woman of childbearing potential (WOCBP) is eligible to participate if she is not pregnant or breastfeeding, and is using an acceptable contraceptive method as described in the trial protocol during the intervention period (for a minimum of 28 days after the last dose of study intervention). This means that it could take a relatively long time before a noticeable number of cases of postvaccination infertility could be observed.
XII. It appears that Pfizer/BioNTech have not yet released any samples of written materials provided to patients, so it is unclear what, if any, instructions/information patients/subjects were given regarding ADE and PEG-related issues and (potential) fertility- or pregnancy-specific issues.
A few common-sense observations in regards to the Pfizer vaccine as presented on the governments' website:
• Vaccine may possibly interfere with other medication or vaccines and could affect the reproductive system, pregnancy and breast feeding.
“No data are available about concomitant use of immunosuppressants” (N.B.: that are commonly used to treat autoimmune diseases such as psoriasis, lupus, rheumatoid arthritis, Chron’s disease, multiple sclerosis atc)
“Interaction with other medicinal products and other forms of interaction : No interaction studies have been performed. Concomitant administration of COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 with other vaccines has not been studied (see section 5.1)”
“Animal reproductive toxicity studies have not been completed. COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 is not recommended during pregnancy. For women of childbearing age, pregnancy should be excluded before vaccination. In addition, women of childbearing age should be advised to avoid pregnancy for at least 2 months after their second dose.”
“It is unknown whether COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 is excreted in human milk. A risk to the newborns/infants cannot be excluded. COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 should not be used during breast-feeding.” “It is unknown whether COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 has an impact on fertility” "Animal studies into potential toxicity to reproduction and development have not been completed." (*)
• The vaccine’s safety in the case of immune-compromised people or people who already had covid-19 is unknown.
The vaccine is still in an experimental phase. Safety and efficacy on a long term (more than 2 months) are unknown. The 2 tests for safety and efficacy comprised 60 participants in the first and 44,000 in the second; In the second, less than half of them, 19.067 have been evaluated for safety and only 2 months after the second dose of the vaccine. The study “excluded participants who were immunocompromised and those who had previous clinical or microbiological diagnosis of COVID-19 disease.” However, the most immunocompromised categories of population the elderly, especially those in care homes, are to be the first recipients of it.
“Participants are planned to be followed for up to 24 months, for assessments of safety and efficacy against COVID-19 disease.” This means again, that this vaccine is clearly in an experimental phase. This is clearly admitted, as its efficacy is not certain: 2The vaccine elicits both neutralizing antibody and cellular immune responses to the spike (S) antigen, which may contribute to protection against COVID-19 disease.”
• The only assurance of safety we get is that “non-clinical data reveal no special hazard for humans based on a CONVENTIONAL STUDY OF REPEAT DOSE TOXICITY
No details are given about this study that should involve the use of animals, but we found out that “repeated dose toxicity comprises the adverse general toxicological effects occurring as a result of repeated daily exposure dose to a substance for a specified period up to the expected lifespan of the test species” (https://ec.europa.eu/.../validated.../repeated-dose-toxicity or https://www.chemsafetypro.com/.../Repeated_Dose_Toxicity...)
As seen in the definition and associated list of tests (oral, dermal, inhalation and chronic) – such could hardly be applied to a vaccine
• The same old Vaccine Damage scheme (tax payers money) will be used to pay the damages done by the covid vaccine. This, of course, in case YOU CAN PROVE, the vaccine was the cause. The residents in care homes, the disabled and institutionalized, the ones lacking capacity or means will never be able to PROVE it. And anyway, let's remember that OFFICIALLY, the two ladies that ended with transverse myelitis after the second dose of Astrazeneca's covid vaccine, have not been injured by the vaccine, the young Brasilian doctor who was in an Oxford vaccine trial and died, took the placebo, the more than 100 of people from South Korea who died after having the flu shot had other causes of death... Yes, the sum is £120,000... which even if you get it, will never bring back your health, your job, your happiness, your plans for the future, will never change you back from being a burden to being a support to your family. - Britain to cover COVID-19 vaccine side-effects under damages scheme https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-health-coronavirus-britain-vaccines-idUKKBN28D2VB?fbclid=IwAR2ZnFw60AyjDxCYjB157hI-sUGGeCzsSkljjBJHSWxFUDxn2N9XYDgWZzE
FOLLOW-Up to the 2 transverse myelitis cases: - AstraZeneca, Under Fire for Vaccine Safety, Releases Trial Blueprints (19 Sept. 2020) - see their trial study here
Experts are concerned that the company has not been more forthcoming about two participants who became seriously ill after getting its experimental vaccine.
"The vaccine being developed by AstraZeneca, which formed a partnership with Oxford University scientists, uses a virus meant to carry coronavirus genes into human cells and trigger an immune response that will protect people from the coronavirus. This so-called vector is a modified form of an adenovirus that causes common colds in chimpanzees but is considered safe for people. Several other companies, including Johnson & Johnson and CanSino, are pursuing similar adenovirus-based approaches, although there are multiple types of adenoviruses, and specific ingredients differ from vaccine to vaccine.
While other adenovirus-based products have seen some success in the past, they have also been linked to serious adverse events. The most famous was the case of 18-year-old Jesse Gelsinger, who died in 1999 after receiving gene therapy through an adenovirus that sparked a lethal inflammatory response from his immune system.
If a serious side effect was definitively linked to AstraZeneca’s vaccine, scientists would need to determine if its root cause stemmed from the adenovirus vector, or perhaps the coronavirus genes it carried — connections that could raise concerns about other companies’ products that rely on the same components."
LETTER TO THE EDITOR OF A CHILDREN'S NEWSPAPER RE: VACCINE PROPAGANDA
I subscribe to your newspaper on behalf of my children, aged _ and _. They are avid readers and very much enjoy having their own newspaper, greatly looking forward to its arrival each week.
I am ordinarily very happy with the standard of journalism and the age-appropriate articles included, which prompt much interesting and lively discussion amongst the family.
However, I am afraid that the high standards from your newspaper I have come to expect were severely diminished with your [date] issue, which included an article I can only describe as sinister state propaganda. The title of this article was 'New Laws Against Anti-Vaxxers?', and instructed children that engaging any concerns about fast-tracked, unlicensed, and experimental medical products equates to "dangerous nonsense".
I am an active campaigner and researcher in the field of children's medical safety, and I know very well that vaccines - like all medical products - come with an array of potential risks and side-effects, some of them severe. This is even so for vaccines that have spent many years or decades in development and that have passed through all the conventional approvals processes, so it is certainly also the case for vaccines that have been produced within a matter of months, and that contain experimental technologies never before utilised on human beings.
Many eminent and entirely "pro-vaccine" authorities have issued stark warnings against these vaccines, including Dr. Peter Hotez (1) and UK scientist Hilda Bastian (2).
To dismiss these and other entirely credible, important, and worthy concerns as "dangerous nonsense" is dangerous nonsense in itself. There is a huge and imperatively important debate that must happen around these vaccines, where scientists and lay people alike are free to ask questions, demand evidence, and express concerns, without being vilified or silenced by the press. This is especially true for media vehicles that are aimed at the highly impressionable minds of children.
Further, I do not appreciate you encouraging children to label and discriminate against others for their beliefs by the inclusion of the slur "anti-vaxxer", a term which has become a denigrating and pejorative taunt meant to imply someone is unreasonable, delusional, or even dangerous. Expressing concerns about fast-tracked, experimental medical products is certainly not unreasonable or dangerous, and nor is it "anti" anything. Rather, it is pro-safety, pro-transparency, and pro-accountability, characteristics which recent history reveals the pharmaceutical companies that produce vaccines tend to be rather lacking in. The company Pfizer, that is producing the vaccine shortly to make its debut in the UK, was, in 2009, fined $2.3 billion to settle civil and criminal allegations that it had illegally marketed its painkiller Bextra, which has been withdrawn. This is the largest health care fraud settlement and the largest criminal fine of any kind ever (3).
To not rigorously question a company with such a history when it is producing a fast-tracked product aimed at our most vulnerable citizens is not just slightly remiss, it may border on criminal negligence.
I am bringing up my children to be open-minded critical thinkers, and I do not wish them to be recipients of emotive and misleading propaganda dressed up as respectable journalism. Why the UK Government wishes to silence and even criminalise perfectly reasonable debates on medical safety is a question any diligent journalist ought to be extremely interested in exploring, rather than simply parroting state dogma.
If you wish to retain my custom, I expect you to resolve this matter in a subsequent issue by posting a balanced and evidence-based piece regarding both the risks and benefits of vaccinations, and underlining the critical importance of preserving people's sovereign rights - including children's - to ask questions.
After all, isn't that what journalism is supposed to be all about?
Find this letter permanently at: https://miriaf.webs.com/propaganda-children-vaccines
FROM THE CDC; 3,150 people vaccinated in The first week and are "unable to perform normal daily activities, unable to work" after vaccination.
This is a massive 2.7% of people who can no longer work after having the Pfizer vaccine.
Portuguese health worker, 41, dies two days after getting the Pfizer covid vaccine as her father says he 'wants answers'
Mexican doctor hospitalized after receiving COVID-19 vaccine
Hundreds of Israelis get infected with Covid-19 after receiving Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine.
Wife of 'perfectly healthy' Miami doctor, 56, who died of a blood disorder 16 days after getting Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine is certain it was triggered by the jab, as drug giant investigates first death with a suspected link to shot.
75-year-old Israeli man dies 2 hours after getting Covid-19 vaccine.
Death of Swiss man after Pfizer vaccine.
88-year-old collapses and dies several hours after being vaccinated.
Thousands negatively affected after getting Covid-19 vaccine.
Hospital worker with no prior allergies in intensive care with severe reaction after Pfizer Covid vaccine.
4 volunteers develop FACIAL PARALYSIS after taking Pfizer Covid-19 jab, prompting FDA to recommend ‘surveillance for cases’.
Investigation launched as 2 people die in Norway nursing home days after receiving Pfizer’s Covid-19 vaccine.
Hundreds Sent to Emergency Room After Getting COVID-19 Vaccines
U.S. officials report more severe allergic reactions to COVID-19 vaccines.
NHS told not to give Covid vaccine to those with history of allergic reactions.
COVID-19: Single vaccine dose leads to 'greater risk' from new coronavirus variants, South African experts warn
CDC reveals at least 21 Americans have suffered life threatening allergic reactions to Pfizer's COVID vaccine
Woman experiences side effects of COVID-19 vaccine
COVID Vaccine Side Effects More Common After 2nd Dose.
Bulgaria Reports 4 Cases Of Side Effects From Pfizer Covid Vaccine.
Two NHS workers suffer allergic reaction to Pfizer vaccine.
24 Dead And 137 Infected In Nursing Home After COVID-19 Vaccination – Previously, They Had ZERO Deaths From Covid!!! - Covid-19 outbreak at Auburn nursing home infects 137 residents, kills 24 https://www.syracuse.com/coronavirus/2021/01/covid-19-outbreak-at-auburn-nursing-home-infects-137-residents-kills-24.html. [...] There had been no nursing home Covid-19 deaths in Cayuga County until the first three deaths at the Commons were reported Dec. 29. [...] The nursing home began vaccinating residents Dec. 22. So far 193 residents, or 80%, and 113 employees, or less than half the staff, have been vaccinated. The nursing home plans to do more vaccinations Jan. 12