Questions to and answers from authorities regarding the flu vaccine in the context of the pandemic  

 Proof of that Covid19 Vaccine will be effective (dr. Bartholomeus Lakeman FOIA addressed to the Department of Health and Social Care) 4 Nov 2020  

AstraZeneca vaccine AZD1222 will it prevent a covid19 infection (dr. Bartholomeus Lakeman FOIA addressed to the Department of Health and Social Care) 28 Oct 2020 

See also VACCINATION PAGE   / FLU VACCINE PAGE 

THE NUREMBERG CODE aimed to protect human subjects from enduring the kind of cruelty and exploitation the prisoners endured at concentration camps. The 10 elements of the code are: 

• Voluntary consent is essential
• The results of any experiment must be for the greater good of society
• Human experiments should be based on previous animal experimentation
• Experiments should be conducted by avoiding physical/mental suffering and injury
• No experiments should be conducted if it is believed to cause death/disability
• The risks should never exceed the benefits
• Adequate facilities should be used to protect subjects
• Experiments should be conducted only by qualified scientists
• Subjects should be able to end their participation at any time
• The scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment when injury, disability, or death is likely to occur

The Charter of Patient Rights and Responsibilities from NHS SCOTLANDstipulates at page 13:"You have the right to accept or refuse any treatment, examination, test or screening procedure that is offered to you. - If you can understand the information you are given and are capable of making a decision for yourself about the care or treatment you are offered, then you have the right to accept or refuse any treatment, examination, test, or screening procedure, or to take part in research."  - Bubble indemnity: Big Pharma firms will NOT be held accountable for side effects of Covid vaccine: AN example of how academics justify mandatory vaccination as compatible with  human rights (ECHT) - Written evidence from Dr Lisa Forsberg*, Dr Isra Black**, Dr Thomas Douglas*, Dr Jonathan Pugh* (COV0220) - Compulsory vaccination for Covid-19 and human rights law(no mention to vaccination risks or the disputable ethic of the vaccine producing corporations - see  Violation Tracker Parent Company Summary - Ex:  AstraZeneca,  Sanofi,  Pfizer  )  
 

  - Speed of coronavirus vaccine race 'crazy' and unsafe, scientists warn  'The more this moves into politics, the more it becomes a little crazy,' one leading expert says:
Add to this an interesting response from Michael Yeadon  a PHD in Pharmacology: - "If any such vaccine is approved for use under any circumstances that are not EXPLICITLY experimental, I believe that recipients are being misled to a criminal extent.  This is because there are precisely zero human volunteers for.."
Past vaccine disasters show why rushing a coronavirus vaccine now would be 'colossally stupid'  (CNN)VACCINE EXPERTS ARE WARNING THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AGAINST RUSHING OUT A CORONAVIRUS VACCINE BEFORE TESTING HAS SHOWN IT'S BOTH SAFE AND EFFECTIVE. DECADES OF HISTORY SHOW WHY THEY'RE RIGHT."This could do substantial damage," Kinch said. Kinch, who is a patient in one of the vaccine trials himself, said the clinical trial process needs to be followed to the end. A too-early EUA for a vaccine could cause a "nightmare scenario," for a few reasons.One, the vaccine may not be safe. Two, if it is not safe, people will lose faith in vaccines. Three, if a vaccine doesn't offer complete protection, people will have a false sense of security and increase their risk. Four, if a substandard vaccine gets an EUA, a better vaccine may never get approval, because people would be reluctant to enroll in trials and risk getting a placebo instead of a vaccine."People are going to die unnecessarily if we take chances with this," Kinch said. "We've got to get this right."
Pfizer expands coronavirus vaccine trial to include children as young as 12 (RT Oct. 12) "The expanded testing comes as Pfizer and a number of other drug makers race to complete phase III trials and seek emergency FDA approval for their inoculations, with Pfizer currently the frontrunner and the first to begin testing for children. "
Oxford University & AstraZeneca’s Toxic Vaccine Tested On Children (Sept 2020, The Bernicicn)" Until four days ago, AstraZeneca was testing the Oxford University vaccine on children, before they halted the tests after an adult subject was reported to have developed symptoms of transverse myelitis, an inflammatory syndrome that affects the spinal cord, which is known to cause serious neurological disorder.The previously untested COVID-1984 vaccine, which failed to cure monkeys of the virus [that has never been proven to exist], was being tested on children aged between 5 and 12 years old, with the alleged consent of their parents or guardians, despite the fact that their young bodies are much more susceptible to vaccine injury than adults."
Johnson & Johnson and AstraZeneca Making Coronavirus Vaccines Using Cells From Aborted Babies

UK to host ‘human challenge’ trials for COVID-19 vaccines (Al Jazeera, Sept. 2020) - In January, volunteers will be deliberately infected with coronavirus to test effectiveness of vaccine candidates.- confirmed by Metro 20 Oct. 2020  - Humans to be deliberately infected with Covid in UK to speed up vaccine
Humans to be deliberately infected with Covid in UK to speed up vaccine" The group of 90 participants will be aged 18 to 30 and will be carefully monitored to assess how the vaccine works and any possible side effects. ADVERTISEMENT Visit our live blog for the latest updates Coronavirus news live It is hoped trials will start in January, with results expected by May 2021, pending approval from regulatory bodies and ethics committees.NOTE: Two healthy people getting transverse myelitis in the Astrazeneca trials after the second shot already .... no animal studies... Furthermore, the whole script is based on the belief that the Virus can cause death.So, no doubt, this is HUMAN EXPERIMENTATION: THE NUREMBERG CODE says the following Human experiments should be based on previous animal experimentation No experiments should be conducted if it is believed to cause death/disability
Mercola: How COVID-19 Vaccine Trials Are Rigged (Oct 2020)However, when it comes to the COVID-19 vaccine, shockingly, preventing infection is not a criterion for success in any of these trials. The only criterion for a successful COVID-19 vaccine is a reduction of COVID-19 symptoms, and even then, the reduction required is minimal.“We all expect an effective vaccine to prevent serious illness if infected. Three of the vaccine protocols — Moderna, Pfizer, and AstraZeneca — do not require that their vaccine prevent serious disease only that they prevent moderate symptoms which may be as mild as cough, or headache,” Haseltine writes,2 adding:“The pharmaceutical companies intend to do trials ranging from 30,000 to 60,000 participants. This scale of study would be sufficient for testing vaccine efficacy.The first surprise found upon a closer reading of the protocols reveals that each study intends to complete interim and primary analyses that at most include 164 participants. These companies likely intend to apply for an emergency use authorization (EUA) from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) with just their limited preliminary results. [...]  As if that’s not eyebrow-raising enough, the minimum qualification for a “case of COVID-19” amounts to just one positive PCR test and one or two mild symptoms, such as headache, fever, cough or mild nausea. As noted by Haseltine, “This is far from adequate.”All they’re doing is testing to see if this COVID-19 vaccine will minimize common cold symptoms. They are not actually ensuring the vaccine will prevent serious COVID-19 complications. Johnson & Johnson’s trial is the only one that requires at least five severe COVID-19 cases to be included in the interim analysis.” See also the previous Forbes' article:  Covid-19 Vaccine Protocols Reveal That Trials Are Designed To Succeed (Sept 2020)
High volume of COVID-19 vaccine “adverse drug reactions” expected in the UK, is the United States next? (23 Nov 2020)" Supplies – 506291-2020 was officially dispatched back in mid-October by the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency.  MHRA is an executive agency in the UK and sponsored in part by the Department of Health and Social Care that “regulates medicines, medical devices and blood components for transfusion.”In the contract, MHRA clearly states that they expect a “high volume” of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in response to the upcoming COVID-19 vaccine"

CRACKED TEETH & OTHER COVID VACCINE SIDE EFFECTS (as also the VACCINE TRIALS' ISSUES) - Del Bigtree and investigative journalist Jeffrey Jaxen (video) - October 2020 

 Peter Doshi: Pfizer and Moderna’s “95% effective” vaccines—let’s be cautious and first see the full data (BMJ) Dec 2020

" Let’s put this in perspective. First, a relative risk reduction is being reported, not absolute risk reduction, which appears to be less than 1%. Second, these results refer to the trials’ primary endpoint of covid-19 of essentially any severity, and importantly not the vaccine’s ability to save lives, nor the ability to prevent infection, nor the efficacy in important subgroups (e.g. frail elderly). Those still remain unknown. Third, these results reflect a time point relatively soon after vaccination, and we know nothing about vaccine performance at 3, 6, or 12 months, so cannot compare these efficacy numbers against other vaccines like influenza vaccines (which are judged over a season). Fourth, children, adolescents, and immunocompromised individuals were largely excluded from the trials, so we still lack any data on these important populations.

I previously argued that the trials are studying the wrong endpoint, and for an urgent need to correct course and study more important endpoints like prevention of severe disease and transmission in high risk people."

 Kevin Corbett & Kate Shemirani : GENOCIDE NOTICE addressed to  Vicky Ford MP Parliamentary Under Secretary of State for Children and Families and to  Matt HancockDear Under Secretary,We are writing to you with regard to the planned Covid-19 vaccination program.We wish to draw your attention to the expected high number of adverse reactions which the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) explicitly state are a “direct threat to patient life and public health”:“For reasons of extreme urgency under Regulation 32(2)(c) related to the release of a Covid-19 vaccine MHRA have accelerated the sourcing and implementation of a vaccine specific AI tool.Strictly necessary — it is not possible to retrofit the MHRA’s legacy systems to handle the volume of Adverse Drug Reactions [ADRs] that will be generated by a Covid-19 vaccine. Therefore, if the MHRA does not implement the AI tool, it will be unable to process these ADRs effectively. This will hinder its ability to rapidly identify any potential safety issues with the Covid-19 vaccine and represents a direct threat to patient life and public health.Reasons of extreme urgency — the MHRA recognises that its planned procurement process for the SafetyConnect programme, including the AI tool, would not have concluded by vaccine launch.”https://ted.europa.eu/udl?uri=TED:NOTICE:506291-2020:TEXT:EN:HTML&src=0We, as health care professionals having a combined experience in excess of seventy years, with extensive knowledge of the history of vaccines, vaccine ingredients and their side-effects, are deeply concerned about the MHRA’s expected morbidity and mortality in vaccine recipients.We therefore hereby inform you that if the planned vaccination program shall proceed then you will be directly culpable for the infant mortality and damage caused to children for whom you and the local authorities you oversee are responsible. [...]
Hundreds of NHS staff form anti-vax group and label new Covid jabs 'poison  "NHS and care home staff in their hundreds have formed a group opposed to vaccinations, wearing masks and testing in hospitals.The 250 plus-member strong group, NHS Workers for Choice, No Restrictions for Declining a Vaccine, includes a GP, several A&E nurses, healthcare assistants, lab workers, and care home staff."-  NHS workers for choice, no restrictions for declining a vaccine.  (FB Group) 

Message from the Pr. PERRONNE on vaccines! (Dec 2020)

Dear friends,

France, which has been having a nightmare for months, is waking up.
In many cities in our beautiful country, the people are on the move to regain their freedom, to demand the return of democracy.

As a doctor, infectious disease specialist and having served as president of many public health bodies or advice, including vaccines, I measure daily the uncertainties that generate fear and increasing disarray of our fellow citizens. I take the risk of being called a ′′ conspiracy ′′ or better a ′′ reassurist ", terms referring to those who criticize or challenge the unique thought.

I end up being proud of these names, my words expressing the truth have never changed since the epidemic began. So I consider it my responsibility to express myself again today on the whole medical aspect of Covid-19 and especially on the subject of vaccination, now the central and almost unique element of health policy in the state.

Many French people have been mesmerized by the politics of fear. Since September 2020, we had been told a terrible second wave of the epidemic, worse than the first.
The Minister of Health, Dr. Olivier Véran, the President of the Scientific Council of the Elysee, Professor Jean Fran ançois Delfraissy, the Director
General of Health, Professor Jerome Solomon, the Pasteur Institute have announced catastrophic numbers with an exponential increase in the death toll. Hospitals needed to be saturated and overwhelmed.

Even the President of the Republic, during a recent TV address announcing reconfinement, predicted no less than 400.000 deaths, falling out of the 200.000
Estimated dead shortly before by Professor Arnaud Fontanet of Pastor.

These unrealistic numbers had only one goal, to maintain fear to make us stay confined, wisely masked. Yet the widespread use of masks in general population has no scientific interest in stopping the SARS-COV-2. epidemic.

The use of masks should be targeted to the sick, their surroundings (especially at-risk) and carers on contact.

The epidemic is regressing and has not led to any apocalypse. The dynamics of the curve have been showing for weeks the profile of a seasonal epidemic rebound that is seen with certain viruses, once the epidemic wave is over.

This reflects the adaptation of the virus to humans and is also a reflection of the collective immunity that is progressing in the population and protecting us naturally.

The virus strains currently circulating have lost their virulence. Authorities won't be able to say it's because the downward trend had started even before it was put in place.

The regression of the epidemic had even begun, in some agglomerations, before curfew was introduced.

Unfortunately, there are still deaths that happen in very elderly, big obese or people with severe diabetes, severe high blood pressure, already disabling cardiorespiratory or kidney diseases.

These people at risk are perfectly identified. Health measures should therefore be targeted to protect, screen and treat them as soon as possible with hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin symptoms which are widely confirmed with the efficacy and safety if given early treatment.

Many deaths could have been prevented. However, general practitioners and geriatricians have been deterred from treating.

In this context, continuing to persecute our children behind useless masks remains incomprehensible.
All these measures are taken to ensure that the French are demanding a vaccine. What's the point of a widespread vaccine for a disease with nearly 0,05 % mortality? None. This mass vaccination is pointless. Also, the risks of vaccination can be greater than the benefits.

The most disturbing part is that many countries, including France, are saying they are ready to vaccinate in the coming weeks, as the development and evaluation of these products went fast and no result of the effectiveness or the danger of these vaccines has not been published to date.

We only had the right to press releases from the industrial manufacturers, allowing their stock exchanges to flame.

The worst part is that the first ′′ vaccines ′′ we are offered are not vaccines, but gene therapy products.

We're going to inject nucleic acids that will cause our own cells to make virus elements.

The consequences of this injection are absolutely unknown because it is a first in humans. What if some ′′ vaccinated ′′ cells made too many viral elements, causing uncontrollable reactions in our bodies?

The first gene therapies will be at RNA, but there are projects with DNA. Normally, in our cells, the message is from DNA to RNA, but the opposite is possible in certain circumstances, especially since our human cells have contained so-called ′′ endogenous ′′ retroviruses integrated into our DNA since the beginning of the night. chromosomes.

These ′′ domesticated ′′ retroviruses that inhabit us are usually harmless
(unlike HIV, AIDS retrovirus for example), but they can produce an enzyme, reverse transcriptase, capable of transcribing backwards, from RNA to DNA.

Thus an RNA that is foreign to our body and administered by injection could code for equally foreign DNA that can fit into our chromosomes.

So there is a real risk of transforming our genes permanently. There is also the possibility, by modifying the nucleic acids of our ova or sperm, to pass these genetic modifications on to our children.

People who promote these gene therapies, falsely called ′′ vaccines ′′ are wizard apprentices and take the French and more
generally world citizens, for guinea pigs.

We don't want to become, like tomatoes or the but transgenic GMOs (genetically modified organisms). A medical officer of one of the pharmaceutical laboratories manufacturers said a few days ago that he hopes for a personal protective effect, but that it shouldn't be too hopeful for an impact on the transmission of the virus, so on the dynamics of the epidemic.

This is a confession in disguise that it is not a vaccine. A fill.

I'm all the more horrified that I've always been in favour of vaccines and have presided over over immunization policy bodies for years.

Today, stop this extremely disturbing plan. Louis Pastor must turn around in his grave.
Science, medical ethics and above all common sense must take over.

 Dr. Wodarg and Dr. Yeadon request a stop of all corona vaccination studies and call for co-signing the petition (1 Dec 2020)

Some great disclosures follow:

• "The formation of so-called “non-neutralizing antibodies” can lead to an exaggerated immune reaction, especially when the test person is confronted with the real, “wild” virus after vaccination. This so-called antibody-dependent amplification, ADE, has long been known from experiments with corona vaccines in cats, for example. In the course of these studies all cats that initially tolerated the vaccination well died after catching the wild virus.
• The vaccinations are expected to produce antibodies against spike proteins of SARS-CoV-2. However, spike proteins also contain syncytin-homologous proteins, which are essential for the formation of the placenta in mammals such as humans. It must be absolutely ruled out that a vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 could trigger an immune reaction against syncytin-1, as otherwise infertility of indefinite duration could result in vaccinated women.
• The mRNA vaccines from BioNTech/Pfizer contain polyethylene glycol (PEG). 70% of people develop antibodies against this substance – this means that many people can develop allergic, potentially fatal reactions to the vaccination.
• The much too short duration of the study does not allow a realistic estimation of the late effects. As in the narcolepsy cases after the swine flu vaccination, millions of healthy people would be exposed to an unacceptable risk if an emergency approval were to be granted and the possibility of observing the late effects of the vaccination were to follow. Nevertheless, BioNTech/Pfizer apparently submitted an application for emergency approval on December 1, 2020."

The full text of the petition of Dr. Wodarg and Dr. Yeadon (containing a scientific critic of the PCR test) can be found here

An Excerpt from  this petition concerning the issue of coronavirus vaccines: 

VIII. For a vaccine to work, our immune system needs to be stimulated to produce a neutralizing antibody, as opposed to a non-neutralizing antibody. A neutralizing antibody is one that can recognize and bind to some region (‘epitope’) of the virus, and that subsequently results in the virus either not entering or replicating in your cells. A non-neutralizing antibody is one that can bind to the virus, but for some reason, the antibody fails to neutralize the infectivity of the virus. In some viruses, if a person harbors a non-neutralizing antibody to the virus, a subsequent infection by the virus can cause that person to elicit a more severe reaction to the virus due to the presence of the non-neutralizing antibody. This is not true for all viruses, only particular ones. This is called Antibody Dependent Enhancement (ADE), and is a common problem with Dengue Virus, Ebola Virus, HIV, RSV, and the family of coronaviruses. In fact, this problem of ADE is a major reason why many previous vaccine trials for other coronaviruses failed. Major safety concerns were observed in animal models. If ADE occurs in an individual, their response to the virus can be worse than their response if they had never developed an antibody in the first place. This can cause a hyperinflammatory response, a cytokine storm, and a generally dysregulation of the immune system that allows the virus to cause more damage to our lungs and other organs of our body. In addition, new cell types throughout our body are now susceptible to viral infection due to the additional viral entry pathway. There are many studies that demonstrate that ADE is a persistent problem with coronaviruses in general, and in particular, with SARS-related viruses. ADE has proven to be a serious challenge with coronavirus vaccines, and this is the primary reason many of such vaccines have failed in early in-vitro or animal trials. For example, rhesus macaques who were vaccinated with the Spike protein of the SARS-CoV virus demonstrated severe acute lung injury when challenged with SARS-CoV, while monkeys who were not vaccinated did not. Similarly, mice who were immunized with one of four different SARS-CoV vaccines showed histopathological changes in the lungs with eosinophil infiltration after being challenged with   SARS-CoV virus. 

IX. There are some concerning issues with the trial designs, spelled out by Dr. Peter Doshi in the British Medical Journal. Dr. Doshi focuses on the two biggest issues. First, none of the leading vaccine candidate trials is designed to test if the vaccine can reduce severe COVID-19 symptoms, defined as: hospital admissions, ICU or death. And, second, the trials are not designed to test if the vaccine can interrupt transmission (https://www.bmj.com/content/bmj/371/bmj.m4037.full.pdf). If neither of these conditions is met, the vaccine in essence performs like a therapeutic drug, except a vaccine would be taken prophylactically, even by the perfectly healthy, and more than likely carries a higher risk of injury than a therapeutic drug. If this were to be true, then therapeutic drugs would be superior to any COVID vaccine. X. In the Pfizer/BioNTech mRNA vaccine candidate, polyethylene glycol (PEG) is found in the fatty lipid nanoparticle coating around the mRNA. Seventy percent of people make antibodies to PEG and most do not know it, creating a concerning situation where many could have allergic, potentially deadly, reactions to a PEG-containing vaccine. PEG antibodies may also reduce vaccine effectiveness. Pfizer/BioNTech is also inserting an ingredient derived from a marine invertebrate, mNeonGreen, into its vaccine. The ingredient has bioluminescent qualities, making it attractive for medical imaging purposes, but it is unclear why an injected vaccine would need to have that quality. mNeonGreen has unknown antigenicity. 

XI. Several vaccine candidates are expected to induce the formation of humoral antibodies against spike proteins of SARS-CoV-2. Syncytin-1 (see Gallaher, B., “Response to nCoV2019 Against Backdrop of Endogenous Retroviruses” - http://virological.org/t/response-to-ncov2019- against-backdrop-of-endogenous-retroviruses/396), which is derived from human endogenous retroviruses (HERV) and is responsible for the development of a placenta in mammals and humans and is therefore an essential prerequisite for a successful pregnancy, is also found in homologous form in the spike proteins of SARS viruses. There is no indication whether antibodies against spike proteins of SARS viruses would also act like anti-Syncytin-1 antibodies. However, if this were to be the case this would then also prevent the formation of a placenta which would result in vaccinated women essentially becoming infertile. To my knowledge, Pfizer/BioNTech has yet to release any samples of written materials provided to patients, so it is unclear what, if any, information regarding (potential) fertility-specific risks caused by antibodies is included. According to section 10.4.2 of the Pfizer/BioNTech trial protocol, a woman of childbearing potential (WOCBP) is eligible to participate if she is not pregnant or breastfeeding, and is using an acceptable contraceptive method as described in the trial protocol during the intervention period (for a minimum of 28 days after the last dose of study intervention). This means that it could take a relatively long time before a noticeable number of cases of postvaccination infertility could be observed.

 XII. It appears that Pfizer/BioNTech have not yet released any samples of written materials provided to patients, so it is unclear what, if any, instructions/information patients/subjects were given regarding ADE and PEG-related issues and (potential) fertility- or pregnancy-specific issues.  

 A few common-sense observations in regards to the Pfizer vaccine as presented on the governments' website: 

• Vaccine may possibly interfere with other medication or vaccines and could affect the reproductive system, pregnancy and breast feeding. 

 “No data are available about concomitant use of immunosuppressants” (N.B.: that are commonly used to treat autoimmune diseases such as psoriasis, lupus, rheumatoid arthritis, Chron’s disease, multiple sclerosis atc) 

“Interaction with other medicinal products and other forms of interaction : No interaction studies have been performed. Concomitant administration of COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 with other vaccines has not been studied (see section 5.1)”

 “Animal reproductive toxicity studies have not been completed. COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 is not recommended during pregnancy. For women of childbearing age, pregnancy should be excluded before vaccination. In addition, women of childbearing age should be advised to avoid pregnancy for at least 2 months after their second dose.” 

“It is unknown whether COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 is excreted in human milk. A risk to the newborns/infants cannot be excluded. COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 should not be used during breast-feeding.” “It is unknown whether COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 has an impact on fertility” "Animal studies into potential toxicity to reproduction and development have not been completed."  (*)

See also:  

• The vaccine’s safety in the case of immune-compromised people or people who already had covid-19 is unknown. 

The vaccine is still in an experimental phase. Safety and efficacy on a long term (more than 2 months) are unknown. The 2 tests for safety and efficacy comprised 60 participants in the first and 44,000 in the second; In the second, less than half of them, 19.067 have been evaluated for safety and only 2 months after the second dose of the vaccine. The study “excluded participants who were immunocompromised and those who had previous clinical or microbiological diagnosis of COVID-19 disease.” However, the most immunocompromised categories of population the elderly, especially those in care homes, are to be the first recipients of it. 

“Participants are planned to be followed for up to 24 months, for assessments of safety and efficacy against COVID-19 disease.” This means again, that this vaccine is clearly in an experimental phase. This is clearly admitted, as its efficacy is not certain: 2The vaccine elicits both neutralizing antibody and cellular immune responses to the spike (S) antigen, which may contribute to protection against COVID-19 disease.”  

• The only assurance of safety we get is that “non-clinical data reveal no special hazard for humans based on a CONVENTIONAL STUDY OF REPEAT DOSE TOXICITY 

No details are given about this study that should involve the use of animals, but we found out that “repeated dose toxicity comprises the adverse general toxicological effects occurring as a result of repeated daily exposure dose to a substance for a specified period up to the expected lifespan of the test species” (https://ec.europa.eu/.../validated.../repeated-dose-toxicity or https://www.chemsafetypro.com/.../Repeated_Dose_Toxicity...) 

As seen in the definition and associated list of tests (oral, dermal, inhalation and chronic) – such could hardly be applied to a vaccine  

See also: 

• The same old Vaccine Damage scheme (tax payers money) will be used to pay the damages done by the covid vaccine.  This, of course, in case YOU CAN PROVE, the vaccine was the cause. The residents in care homes, the disabled and institutionalized, the ones lacking capacity or means will never be able to PROVE it. And anyway,  let's remember that OFFICIALLY, the two ladies that ended with transverse myelitis after the second dose of Astrazeneca's covid vaccine, have not been injured by the vaccine, the young Brasilian doctor who was in an Oxford vaccine trial and died, took the placebo, the more than 100 of people from South Korea who died after having the flu shot had other causes of death... Yes, the sum is £120,000... which even if you get it, will never bring back your health, your job, your happiness, your plans for the future, will never change you back from being a burden to being a support to your family. - Britain to cover COVID-19 vaccine side-effects under damages scheme https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-health-coronavirus-britain-vaccines-idUKKBN28D2VB?fbclid=IwAR2ZnFw60AyjDxCYjB157hI-sUGGeCzsSkljjBJHSWxFUDxn2N9XYDgWZzE 

FOLLOW-Up to the 2 transverse myelitis cases: -  AstraZeneca, Under Fire for Vaccine Safety, Releases Trial Blueprints (19 Sept. 2020) - see their trial study here

Experts are concerned that the company has not been more forthcoming about two participants who became seriously ill after getting its experimental vaccine. 

"The vaccine being developed by AstraZeneca, which formed a partnership with Oxford University scientists, uses a virus meant to carry coronavirus genes into human cells and trigger an immune response that will protect people from the coronavirus. This so-called vector is a modified form of an adenovirus that causes common colds in chimpanzees but is considered safe for people. Several other companies, including Johnson & Johnson and CanSino, are pursuing similar adenovirus-based approaches, although there are multiple types of adenoviruses, and specific ingredients differ from vaccine to vaccine.

While other adenovirus-based products have seen some success in the past, they have also been linked to serious adverse events. The most famous was the case of 18-year-old Jesse Gelsinger, who died in 1999 after receiving gene therapy through an adenovirus that sparked a lethal inflammatory response from his immune system.

If a serious side effect was definitively linked to AstraZeneca’s vaccine, scientists would need to determine if its root cause stemmed from the adenovirus vector, or perhaps the coronavirus genes it carried — connections that could raise concerns about other companies’ products that rely on the same components."

LETTER TO THE EDITOR OF A CHILDREN'S NEWSPAPER RE: VACCINE PROPAGANDA

Dear Editor,

I subscribe to your newspaper on behalf of my children, aged _ and _. They are avid readers and very much enjoy having their own newspaper, greatly looking forward to its arrival each week.

I am ordinarily very happy with the standard of journalism and the age-appropriate articles included, which prompt much interesting and lively discussion amongst the family.

However, I am afraid that the high standards from your newspaper I have come to expect were severely diminished with your [date] issue, which included an article I can only describe as sinister state propaganda. The title of this article was 'New Laws Against Anti-Vaxxers?', and instructed children that engaging any concerns about fast-tracked, unlicensed, and experimental medical products equates to "dangerous nonsense".

I am an active campaigner and researcher in the field of children's medical safety, and I know very well that vaccines - like all medical products - come with an array of potential risks and side-effects, some of them severe. This is even so for vaccines that have spent many years or decades in development and that have passed through all the conventional approvals processes, so it is certainly also the case for vaccines that have been produced within a matter of months, and that contain experimental technologies never before utilised on human beings.

Many eminent and entirely "pro-vaccine" authorities have issued stark warnings against these vaccines, including Dr. Peter Hotez (1) and UK scientist Hilda Bastian (2).

To dismiss these and other entirely credible, important, and worthy concerns as "dangerous nonsense" is dangerous nonsense in itself. There is a huge and imperatively important debate that must happen around these vaccines, where scientists and lay people alike are free to ask questions, demand evidence, and express concerns, without being vilified or silenced by the press. This is especially true for media vehicles that are aimed at the highly impressionable minds of children.

Further, I do not appreciate you encouraging children to label and discriminate against others for their beliefs by the inclusion of the slur "anti-vaxxer", a term which has become a denigrating and pejorative taunt meant to imply someone is unreasonable, delusional, or even dangerous. Expressing concerns about fast-tracked, experimental medical products is certainly not unreasonable or dangerous, and nor is it "anti" anything. Rather, it is pro-safety, pro-transparency, and pro-accountability, characteristics which recent history reveals the pharmaceutical companies that produce vaccines tend to be rather lacking in. The company Pfizer, that is producing the vaccine shortly to make its debut in the UK, was, in 2009, fined $2.3 billion to settle civil and criminal allegations that it had illegally marketed its painkiller Bextra, which has been withdrawn. This is the largest health care fraud settlement and the largest criminal fine of any kind ever (3). 

To not rigorously question a company with such a history when it is producing a fast-tracked product aimed at our most vulnerable citizens is not just slightly remiss, it may border on criminal negligence.

I am bringing up my children to be open-minded critical thinkers, and I do not wish them to be recipients of emotive and misleading propaganda dressed up as respectable journalism. Why the UK Government wishes to silence and even criminalise perfectly reasonable debates on medical safety is a question any diligent journalist ought to be extremely interested in exploring, rather than simply parroting state dogma.

If you wish to retain my custom, I expect you to resolve this matter in a subsequent issue by posting a balanced and evidence-based piece regarding both the risks and benefits of vaccinations, and underlining the critical importance of preserving people's sovereign rights - including children's - to ask questions.

After all, isn't that what journalism is supposed to be all about?

Yours sincerely,

[Name]

References:

1) https://uk.reuters.com/.../as-pressure-for-coronavirus...
2) https://www.wired.com/.../the-astrazeneca-covid-vaccine.../
3) https://www.theguardian.com/.../pfizer-drugs-us-criminal...

--------------
Find this letter permanently at: https://miriaf.webs.com/propaganda-children-vaccines

FROM THE CDC;  3,150 people vaccinated in The first week and  are "unable to perform normal daily activities, unable to work" after vaccination.

This is a massive 2.7% of people who can no longer work after having the Pfizer vaccine.
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/acip/meetings/downloads/slides-2020-12/slides-12-19/05-COVID-CLARK.pdf

Portuguese health worker, 41, dies two days after getting the Pfizer covid vaccine as her father says he 'wants answers'
https://trib.al/eEWi66p

Mexican doctor hospitalized after receiving COVID-19 vaccine
https://www.reuters.com/article/health-coronavirus-mexico-vaccines-idUSKBN2970H3

Hundreds of Israelis get infected with Covid-19 after receiving Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine.
https://www.rt.com/news/511332-israel-vaccination-coronavirus-pfizer/

Wife of 'perfectly healthy' Miami doctor, 56, who died of a blood disorder 16 days after getting Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine is certain it was triggered by the jab, as drug giant investigates first death with a suspected link to shot.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9119431/Miami-doctor-58-dies-three-weeks-receiving-Pfizer-Covid-19-vaccine.html

75-year-old Israeli man dies 2 hours after getting Covid-19 vaccine.
https://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/293865

Death of Swiss man after Pfizer vaccine.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-swiss-death-idUSKBN29413Y

88-year-old collapses and dies several hours after being vaccinated.
https://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/293952

Thousands negatively affected after getting Covid-19 vaccine.
https://m.theepochtimes.com/thousands-negatively-affected-after-getting-covid-19-vaccine_3625914.html

Hospital worker with no prior allergies in intensive care with severe reaction after Pfizer Covid vaccine.
https://metro.co.uk/2020/12/16/hospital-worker-in-intensive-care-after-suffering-severe-allergic-reaction-to-covid-vaccine-13763695/

4 volunteers develop FACIAL PARALYSIS after taking Pfizer Covid-19 jab, prompting FDA to recommend ‘surveillance for cases’.
https://www.rt.com/usa/509081-pfizer-vaccine-fda-bells-palsy-covid/

Investigation launched as 2 people die in Norway nursing home days after receiving Pfizer’s Covid-19 vaccine.
https://www.rt.com/news/511623-norway-covid19-vaccine-deaths/

Hundreds Sent to Emergency Room After Getting COVID-19 Vaccines
https://m.theepochtimes.com/hundreds-sent-to-emergency-room-after-getting-covid-19-vaccines_3644148.html

U.S. officials report more severe allergic reactions to COVID-19 vaccines.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/mobile.reuters.com/article/amp/idUSKBN29B2GS

NHS told not to give Covid vaccine to those with history of allergic reactions.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/world/2020/dec/09/pfizer-covid-vaccine-nhs-extreme-allergy-sufferers-regulators-reaction

COVID-19: Single vaccine dose leads to 'greater risk' from new coronavirus variants, South African experts warn
news.sky.com/story/amp/covid-19-single-vaccine-dose-leads-to-greater-risk-from-new-coronavirus-variants-south-african-experts-warn-12180837

CDC reveals at least 21 Americans have suffered life threatening allergic reactions to Pfizer's COVID vaccine
www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-9119029/amp/At-21-Americans-life-threatening-anaphylaxis-receiving-Pfizers-vaccine-CDC-reveals.html

Woman experiences side effects of COVID-19 vaccine
www.everythinglubbock.com/news/local-news/woman-experiences-side-effects-of-covid-19-vaccine/amp/

COVID Vaccine Side Effects More Common After 2nd Dose.
www.boston.cbslocal.com/2021/01/05/covid-vaccine-side-effects-fever-reaction/amp/

Bulgaria Reports 4 Cases Of Side Effects From Pfizer Covid Vaccine.
www.ndtv.com/world-news/bulgaria-reports-4-cases-of-side-effects-from-pfizer-covid-vaccine-2347667%3Famp=1&akamai-rum=off

Two NHS workers suffer allergic reaction to Pfizer vaccine.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.telegraph.co.uk/global-health/science-and-disease/coronavirus-news-vaccine-pfizer-nhs-oxford-covid-uk-cases/amp/

 24 Dead And 137 Infected In Nursing Home After COVID-19 Vaccination – Previously, They Had ZERO Deaths From Covid!!! - Covid-19 outbreak at Auburn nursing home infects 137 residents, kills 24 https://www.syracuse.com/coronavirus/2021/01/covid-19-outbreak-at-auburn-nursing-home-infects-137-residents-kills-24.html. [...] There had been no nursing home Covid-19 deaths in Cayuga County until the first three deaths at the Commons were reported Dec. 29. [...] The nursing home began vaccinating residents Dec. 22. So far 193 residents, or 80%, and 113 employees, or less than half the staff, have been vaccinated. The nursing home plans to do more vaccinations Jan. 12